Quality of Life Outcomes for Patients Who Underwent Conventional Resection and Liver Transplantation for Locally Advanced Hepatoblastoma
Space:StayCurrentMDAuthor: Zishaan Farooqui, Michael Johnston, Emily Schepers, Nathalie Brewer, Stephen Hartman, Todd Jenkins, Alexander Bondoc, Ahna Pai, James Geller, Gregory M Tiao
Published: 2026-01-27
Expert / Speaker
Zishaan Farooqui, Michael Johnston, Emily Schepers, Nathalie Brewer, Stephen Hartman, Todd Jenkins, Alexander Bondoc, Ahna Pai, James Geller, Gregory M Tiao
Zishaan Farooqui, Michael Johnston, Emily Schepers, Nathalie Brewer, Stephen Hartman, Todd Jenkins, Alexander Bondoc, Ahna Pai, James Geller, Gregory M Tiao
Abstract:
Hepatoblastoma is the most common malignant liver tumor of childhood, with liver transplant and extended resection used as surgical treatments for locally advanced tumors. Although each approach has well-described post-operative complications, quality-of-life outcomes have not been described following the two interventions. Long-term pediatric survivors of hepatoblastoma who underwent conventional liver resection or liver transplantation at a single institution from January 2000-December 2013 were recruited to complete quality-of-life surveys. Survey responses for the Pediatric Quality of Life Generic Core 4.0 (PedsQL, n = 30 patient and n = 31 parent surveys) and Pediatric Quality of Life Cancer Module 3.0 (PedsQL-Cancer, n = 29 patient and n = 31 parent surveys) were collected from patients and parents. The mean total patient-reported PedsQL score was 73.7, and the parent-reported score was 73.9. There were no significant differences in scores on the PedsQL between patients who underwent resection compared to those who underwent transplantation (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). On the PedsQL-Cancer module, procedural anxiety scores were significantly lower for patients who underwent resection as compared to transplant (M = 33.47 points less, CI [-60.41, -6.53], p-value 0.017). This cross-sectional study demonstrates that quality of life outcomes are overall similar among patients receiving transplants and resections. Patients who received a resection reported worse procedural anxiety.
Intended audience: Healthcare professionals and clinicians.
Speaker: Zishaan Farooqui, Michael Johnston, Emily Schepers, Nathalie Brewer, Stephen Hartman, Todd Jenkins, Alexander Bondoc, Ahna Pai, James Geller, Gregory M Tiao
Do you think quality of life is worse for patients who undergo liver transplant compared to resection for hepatblastoma? Hi, I'm Doctor Sophia Schermerhorn from Cincinnati Children's, and this study looks at long-term quality of life outcomes for pediatric patients who undergo liver transplant compared to hepatic resection for locally advanced hepatoblastoma. As survival for hepatoblastoma continues to improve, long-term quality of Life becomes a more important outcome. This single institution cross-sectional study used validated pediatric quality of life surveys to evaluate long-term survivors. Overall, quality of life outcomes were similar between the two groups, with no significant difference in emotional, social, physical, or school functioning outcomes. This challenges the assumption that liver transplantation necessarily leads to a worse. Long-term quality of life. One notable difference was procedural anxiety. Patients who underwent resection had lower overall procedure anxiety scores than transplant patients. This finding was also mirrored in the parents' surveys as well. The key takeaways long-term quality of life outcomes appear comparable between patients who undergo resection and liver transplantation. This means that the surgical strategy can really be focused on oncologic control.
Click "Show Transcript" to view the full transcription (1315 characters)
Comments