Bailey K Roberts, Brendan T Campbell, Aaron R Jensen, Mauricio A Escobar, Regan F Williams, Avery Nathens, Randall S Burd, Christian J Streck, Richard Falcone, Robert W Letton, R Todd Maxson, Mark Miller, Benson S Hsu, Gregory W Albert, Elizabeth Renaud, Nilda Garcia, Julia Holmes, Christopher Hoeft, Chethan Sathya
Background: Quality improvement efforts across pediatric trauma centers have expanded recently in large part because of the American College of Surgeons Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program. However, consensus on quality indicators (QI) specific to pediatric trauma that measure "quality of care" in this population is lacking. This study aims to identify pediatric-specific trauma QI.
Study design: An expert panel of pediatric trauma leaders was convened. The panel met virtually to define and refine potential QI using a modified Delphi method, prioritizing indicators to include representing important QI for pediatric trauma. A comprehensive list of defined QI was created to improve the quality of pediatric trauma care.
Results: 14 experts were included in the panel. After 3 rounds of anonymous voting and meetings, 52 QI were chosen, including 25 outcome, 21 process, and 6 structure variables and spanning 6 domains of quality as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Indicators comprised 22 unchanged from pTQIP, 10 adapted from currently reported in pTQIP, and 20 new. Indicators encompassed unique treatment pathways for pediatric patients, timeliness of care, screening and prevention of future injuries, and long-term outcomes.
Conclusion: A modified Delphi method was used to develop a novel list of pediatric trauma QI to inform quality improvement and benchmarking efforts for pediatric trauma care. Analysis of outcomes is required to understand the accuracy and usefulness of these newly proposed and existing indicators. This study serves as a starting point for the incorporation of new QI within national quality improvement initiatives.
Intended audience: Healthcare professionals and clinicians.
What is quality care in pediatric trauma? I'm Jill Steyer, and this is an article you should know about. Quality improvement has, for lack of a better word, improved in recent years at pediatric trauma centers. This is largely thanks to TQWIP, or the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. But what indicators are we using to measure quality care for pediatric patients? Shouldn't there be a consensus among pediatric trauma centers? In 2025, Roberts et al. published a study in the Journal of Pediatric Surgery. That looked at just that. They surveyed expert pediatric trauma leaders to look at possible QI measures using a modified delta method. After their meetings, they discovered 22 indicators currently in Twp that they would keep, 10 that they would modify, and 20 that they would add. These new indicators included things specific to traumatic brain injuries, the use of DVT prophylaxis, screening for social determinants of health and acute stress, and many more. What indicators would you add for your pediatric patients?
Click "Show Transcript" to view the full transcription (1029 characters)
Comments