Musculoskeletal Outcomes Following Thoracoscopic Versus Conventional Open Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from Pediatric Surgery Meta-Analysis (PESMA) Study Group
Expert / Speaker
Mustafa Azizoglua, Sonia Perez
General Surgery
Timestops
0:00
Esophageal Atresia Repair Methods
Discussing the comparison of thoracoscopic vs open repair methods
0:10
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Azizoglu et al performed a systemic review and meta-analysis on the topic
0:20
Muscle Skeletal Outcomes
Discussing the effects of repair methods on muscular skeletal outcomes
0:30
Scoliosis and Ripenomalies Comparison
Thoracoscopic repair associated with lower rates of scoliosis and ripenomalies
0:40
Long-term Muscular Skeletal Morbidity
Reduced risk of long-term muscular skeletal morbidity with thoracoscopic repair
Topic overview
Mustafa Azizoglua, Sonia Perez Bertolezc, Tahsin Onat Kamcid, Serkan Arslane, Mehmet Hanifi Okurf, Maria Escolinog, Ciro Espositog, Tuba Erdem Sith, Esra Karakasi, Annika Mutanenj, Oliver Muenstererk, Martin Lacherl
Background and objective
Thoracic musculoskeletal deformities are a recognized long-term complication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. Although evidence remains limited, thoracoscopic repair (TR) is thought to reduce morbidity compared to conventional open repair (COR), with potential benefits including earlier recovery, reduced pain, improved cosmesis, and fewer musculoskeletal sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the incidence of musculoskeletal deformities following EA repair via TR versus COR, emphasizing their long-term clinical implications.
Method
The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO(CRD42024576044). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Ovid Medline, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google scholar from inception to January 2025. The primary outcomes assessed were scoliosis, rib anomalies (including deformity, fusion, and adhesions), chest wall anomalies, and scapula alata. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.
Results
Four retrospective studies comprising 283 patients (TR: 96; COR: 187) were included. TR was associated with significantly lower rates of scoliosis (3.1 % vs. 16 %; RR 0.35, 95 % CI 0.14–0.84, p = 0.02) and rib anomalies (0 % vs. 41.5 %; RR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.01–0.25, p = 0.0002). No significant differences were observed for chest wall anomalies (RR 0.65, p = 0.41) or scapula alata (RR 0.37, p = 0.30). However, the small number of studies and variability in diagnostic methods limit the strength and generalizability of these findings.
Conclusion
TR of EA may reduce long-term musculoskeletal morbidity—particularly scoliosis and rib anomalies—when compared to COR. While promising, these results should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size and methodological heterogeneity. Further multicenter studies with standardized outcome definitions are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the role of muscle-sparing techniques.
Intended audience: Healthcare professionals and clinicians.
Categories
Specialty
Disease/Condition
Anatomy/Organ System
Procedure/Intervention
Care Context
Keywords
Keywords will be added soon through AI processing
Hashtags
Hashtags will be added soon through AI processing
Transcript
Speaker: Mustafa Azizoglua, Sonia Perez
Click "Show Transcript" to view the full transcription (705 characters)
Comments