StayCurrentMD · Comparison of robotic versus thoracoscopic repair for congenital esophageal atresia
Follow
Video56 s·Published Feb 2024Older

Comparison of robotic versus thoracoscopic repair for congenital esophageal atresia

hosted by Dr. Cecilia Jigena · StayCurrentMD
Cued at 0:28 · stops at 1:13 · press play
Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to esophageal atresia · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →

More about esophageal atresia

same diagnosisDive deeper → Esophageal Atresia (52 items)

More from StayCurrentMD

same institutionDive deeper → StayCurrentMD
What the experts said0 expert statements · 7 host summaries
The study is a retrospective multi-center study done in China
Host summaryCecilia Gigena · not cited in answers
After propensity score matching, there were 126 patients total, 63 in each group
Host summaryCecilia Gigena · not cited in answers
Robotic surgery had longer operative time compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena · not cited in answers
Robotic surgery had shorter anastomotic time compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena · not cited in answers
The robotic group had lower anastomotic strictures compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena · not cited in answers
The robotic group had lower unplanned readmissions within 2 years post-op compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena · not cited in answers
Robotic surgery appears to be a good option for esophageal atresia repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena · not cited in answers