Do social factors quietly determine what urinary reconstruction our patients end up getting? My name is Megan Reedy Vituri with the Center for Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction at Nationwide Children's Hospital, and this is an article you should know about. This was a single institution retrospective study of 208 patients with neurogenic bladder, anal rectum malformations, myelomaningocele, and other spinal cord pathology who underwent urinary reconstruction between 2014 and 2021. Our team compared continent versus incontinent. Conversions and asked the question, how are social determinants of health playing a role? So what did they find? About 74% underwent continent reconstruction and 26% underwent incontinent reconstruction. There was no difference based on insurance type or childhood opportunity index, but patients who had incontinent reconstruction were more likely to have food insecurity, missed appointments and unmarried parents. And interestingly, patients who traveled from out of state were more likely to have a continent diversion. So what's the takeaway? This isn't just about surgical preference or anatomy. Social stability and the ability to engage with follow-up may be influencing what we offer our families as well as what families can realistically manage. If social factors are steering our decision making, we need to know this upfront. The best reconstruction isn't just one that's technically feasible, it also needs to be sustainable for patients and their families. So would this change the way you think about counseling your families or choosing a reconstruction pathway in your practice? Let us know in the comments below.