The Problem
A child who had undergone thoracoscopic tracheopexy developed dysphagia from a torqued esophagus. The initial operation had addressed the airway collapse but created a new problem: the esophagus was now twisted in a way that interfered with swallowing. The question was whether to accept the dysphagia as the price of a stable airway, attempt endoscopic management, or return to the operating room for a different approach.
The Decision Point
The Cincinnati team chose a combined cervical and thoracic approach 0:49. This was not a simple revision — it required mobilizing the esophagus from above while managing the trachea from the same exposure, in a field already scarred from the prior operation. The risk was injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerves, worsening the dysphagia, or creating vocal fold paralysis on top of the swallowing problem 4:26. The alternative — leaving the child with persistent dysphagia — was unacceptable.
The preoperative workup included dynamic CT imaging, pulmonary function tests, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, and flexible bronchoscopy 0:55. This was not routine imaging; the team needed to understand exactly how the esophagus was positioned relative to the trachea and spine before deciding where to place sutures.
The Operation
The setup was deliberate. A NIM tube was used to monitor recurrent nerve proximity throughout the case 1:39. The endotracheal tube was placed nasotracheally with the cuff positioned high — sometimes almost at the glottis — to allow the pulmonologist clear visualization of the trachea during suture placement 1:29. A neck tray, microlaryngoscopy tray, and Maloney dilators were opened 1:15. Flexible bronchoscopy through the endotracheal tube was continuous 1:21.
The surgical approach used a standard neck incision with subplatysmal flaps 1:55. Residual or regrown thymus was removed because it obstructed the field 2:01. The team worked laterally to the airway to find the esophagus 2:19. The pediatric surgeons identified the recurrent laryngeal nerve for the otolaryngology team 2:23.
The key maneuver was mobilizing the esophagus above the level where the pexy would be performed 2:43. This gave the surgeons room to place sutures exactly where needed without fighting the esophagus 2:49. To visualize the posterior tracheal wall where it sits against the spine, the team placed temporary traction sutures in the trachea itself to pull it forward and out of the way 2:54. The pulmonologist watched from inside the airway with flexible endoscopy as each stitch was placed 3:02.
All sutures were placed before any were tied 3:15. The material was 3-0 Prolene 3:15. The entire suturing sequence was performed under spontaneous ventilation 3:15. This allowed the team to assess airway dynamics in real time rather than discovering problems after extubation.
Aortopexy and innominate artery pexy were added during the same operation 2:09. The combined approach addressed both the anterior and posterior sources of airway compression while correcting the esophageal torque.
## The Outcome
The patient achieved a stable airway and became symptom-free. The dysphagia resolved. The combined approach had corrected what the thoracoscopic approach alone could not.
What the Case Changes
The transferable judgment is this: when a prior tracheopexy creates secondary pathology — esophageal torque, persistent compression, or inadequate stabilization — the cervical approach allows direct access to both structures simultaneously. The esophagus can be mobilized and repositioned. The recurrent nerves can be identified and protected. The airway can be stabilized under direct vision with real-time endoscopic feedback.
Outcome assessment in these cases is not straightforward. At 36 months, imaging may still show some tracheomalacia even when the patient is symptomatically improved 4:09. The field is still defining what constitutes a good versus poor outcome 4:15. Follow-up includes endoscopy, pulmonary function tests when the child is old enough to perform them, and imaging 4:00. Otolaryngology involvement is essential both intraoperatively and during follow-up, and is easier when already integrated into the team structure 4:32.
The combined approach is valuable for complicated cases or patients requiring additional operations for symptom relief 3:24. It is not the first operation for most patients, but it is the right operation when the first approach fails.
Takeaways from this story
- Cervical approach allows simultaneous esophageal mobilization and tracheal stabilization when thoracoscopic pexy fails or creates secondary pathology
- Mobilizing esophagus above the pexy level and using tracheal traction sutures improves visualization for precise suture placement
- Real-time flexible bronchoscopy during suture placement under spontaneous ventilation allows immediate assessment of airway dynamics
- Imaging may show persistent tracheomalacia at 36 months even when patients are symptomatically improved; outcome measures remain under investigation
- NIM tube monitoring and early recurrent nerve identification by pediatric surgery help prevent vocal fold paralysis during cervical dissection