Hello pediatric surgery family, I'm Em Gdy from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and today our team is gonna deliver the articles that you should know about. We have 3 papers today but don't have much time, so let's start. Our first paper titled Pectus Bar Dislocation Comparison Between Three different stabilization techniques adopted in a single center by Donnati et al. This paper is summarized by Lizzie Lee, a physician associate by profession and a member of our team here at Cincinnati Children's dedicated to creating content for pediatric surgery. This was an observational perspective study in Italy from 2013 to 2022 on 468 patients around 15 years old. The surgeons placed 733 bars total, and they wanted to figure out the best technique for preventing the bar from dislocating. Dislocation is when a bar rotates more than 30 degrees out of place. So what did they find? Bridge fixation was significantly more stable than single bar fixation. None of the patients with bridge fixation had dislocated bars compared to those who underwent the single bar technique. This means that bridge fixation is the best for preventing bar dislocation in pectus excavatum patients. Our second paper is applying an explainable machine learning model might reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high probability of acute appendicitis by males at all. And this paper is summarized by Carlos Colunga. He is a pediatric surgeon from Mexico and collaborates with us to produce these article reviews. Researchers from the University of Split have developed a machine learning model with the goal of accurately identifying appendicitis cases while minimizing unnecessary surgery. They did this by garnering data from 551 pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy and using their clinical, laboratory, and anthropometric information to train their machine learning model. Their best performing model achieved an impressive 99.7% sensitivity in identifying appendicitis cases with a specificity that could potentially help reduce up to 17% of negative appendectomies in high risk patients. And when set up to a task, it can also differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis with a high degree of accuracy, and most importantly, it pulls this off by using readily available clinical and lab data without using any advanced imaging. Let's move to the last paper of the day. Transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for pediatric patients with cholelithiasis, a multi-center study by Rao et al. This paper is summarized by Cecilia Ina. She's one of the previous research fellows at Cincinnati Children's Hospital. This is a multi-center retrospective study done in the US from 2018 to 2022, and their aim was to compare patients with suspected clinicalliliasis that underwent a transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus those who underwent ERCP first. They gathered 252 patients, 156 in group one, the Tracystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. And 96 in group two patients who underwent an ERCP first and what they found is that patients in group one had significantly less complication rates and lower length of stay. So it seems that attempting a transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration may benefit our patients. Thank you for listening. Please check the link in the description below to read each paper. We hope you liked this episode. Please follow Stay Current MD on social media, give us a rating, and subscribe to our YouTube channel. And don't forget to download the Stay Current app on the App Store or Play Store for tons of content.