Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: February 2023, BAPS issue

Published:
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: February 2023, BAPS issue podcast cover art
3 Views
0 Likes
0 Shares
0 Comments

StayCurrentMD

View profile →

Inside this episode

Kai, the Library's AI content creator, listened to this episode and mapped who's speaking, the chapters, key claims, and cases. Every item links to the exact moment in the recording.

AI-enriched

Who's speaking

  • Ellen Ancisco — host
  • Speaker 2 — host
  • Mark Davenport — guest
  • Speaker 4 — guest
  • Govind Murti — guest
  • Beth Rmey — guest

Chapters

  • 0:04Introduction and Episode Overview — Hosts introduce themselves as research fellows at Cincinnati Children's Hospital and outline the February 2023 BAPS issue review with guest editor Dr. Mark Davenport from the UK.
  • 1:07Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia Repair — Discussion of Dr. Patkowski's Karl Stortz lecture on thoracoscopic EA repair, covering his Polish center's exclusive use of the technique since 2005, surgical tips, centralization of care, and expert commentary on outcomes and feasibility.
  • 4:55Stoma Management in Hirschsprung Disease — Review of Sheffield study on stoma use in Hirschsprung disease showing 47% of patients required stomas before primary pull-through, with discussion of practice variations between UK and US approaches.
  • 8:40Preoperative Soap Bathing for SSI Prevention — Presentation of Tanzanian randomized controlled trial demonstrating that preoperative soap bathing reduced surgical site infections from 40.6% to 11.4% and decreased length of stay from 22 to 12 days.
  • 11:31Closing and Summary — Recap of the three articles discussed and information about upcoming Stay Current events and resources.

Key claims

  • 1:38Dr. Patkowski's center in Poland has been performing thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair exclusively since 2005 — Ellen Ancisco
  • 1:54The first thoracoscopic EA procedure took almost 4 hours, but the procedure now takes 1 hour — Ellen Ancisco
  • 1:59The Polish center has had no conversions from thoracoscopic to open approach since beginning the technique — Ellen Ancisco
  • 2:06All thoracoscopic EA cases at the Polish center have been managed by one team using only the thoracoscopic approach — Ellen Ancisco
  • 2:25Experience in endoscopic surgery and endoscopic suturing is required for thoracoscopic EA repair — Ellen Ancisco
  • 2:58Centralization of EA care is important even if transportation costs are higher, because complication costs are much higher — Ellen Ancisco
  • 3:06The Polish center handles 15 to 20 EA cases per year, which provides sufficient volume for good experience — Ellen Ancisco
  • 3:38The center in Rocklaw has become the referral center for esophageal atresia and long gap esophageal atresia for all of Poland — Mark Davenport
  • 4:13Centers of excellence for EA repair are showing better outcomes — Speaker 4
  • 4:26Centralization of EA care would be difficult to implement in the United States healthcare system — Speaker 4
  • 5:25The Sheffield study included 95 Hirschsprung disease patients from January 2004 to August 2021 — Ellen Ancisco
  • 5:3547% of the Sheffield cohort needed a stoma before primary pull-through — Govind Murti
  • 5:41In the stoma cohort, 38 patients had ileostomies and the remainder had colostomies — Ellen Ancisco
  • 5:46The most common indication for initial stoma was washout failure in nearly 40% of cases — Ellen Ancisco
  • 6:19Of 20 patients needing post-pull-through stoma formation, 7 occurred within 30 days and 13 after 30 days — Govind Murti
  • 6:28Most post-pull-through stomas after 30 days were needed because of constipation or soiling — Govind Murti
  • 6:35The Sheffield data represents real life surgical reporting and reflects overall Hirschsprung management within the UK — Mark Davenport
  • 7:20US practice typically involves neonatal pull-through or home irrigations with pull-through in first months of life — Beth Rmey
  • 7:39In US practice, pre-pull-through diversion is typically only done for delayed presentation with perforation or complicated cardiac cases — Beth Rmey
  • 8:10Sheffield primarily performs Duhamel pull-throughs while Cincinnati primarily performs Swenson procedures — Ellen Ancisco
  • 8:52The Tanzania study was conducted at Mahambile National Hospital and included 252 patients — Speaker 2
  • 9:26114 patients received preoperative soap bathing and 11.4% developed surgical site infections — Speaker 2
  • 9:26In the control group without soap bathing, 40.6% of patients developed surgical site infections — Speaker 2
  • 9:43Preoperative soap bathing reduced the odds of surgical site infections by 80% — Speaker 2
  • 9:53Length of stay was reduced from 22 days in the non-interventional group to 12 days in the soap bathing group — Mark Davenport
  • 10:04Preoperative bathing was not common practice in Tanzania before this study — Speaker 2
  • 10:41A Cincinnati Children's team working in Tanzania had almost every patient develop wound infections in their first year, but near-zero infections after implementing preoperative baths — Beth Rmey

Points of disagreement

  • 7:01Appropriateness of stoma use in Hirschsprung disease management
    • Govind Murti: Stoma is sometimes a necessity and not always a failure, with 47% of Sheffield patients requiring pre-pull-through stomas
    • Beth Rmey: US practice typically avoids pre-pull-through stomas except for perforations or complicated cardiac cases, preferring home irrigations

Open questions

  • How can centralization of esophageal atresia care be implemented in healthcare systems like the United States where geographic distances are much larger than in European countries?
  • What is the optimal approach to teaching parents rectal washout techniques to reduce the need for stomas in Hirschsprung disease?
  • Why is there such wide practice variation between UK and US centers regarding stoma use in Hirschsprung disease management?
  • Can the simple preoperative soap bathing intervention be successfully implemented in other low-resource settings beyond Tanzania?
This episode was analyzed and enriched by Kai, the Library's AI content creator. Every item links to the moment it comes from — click a timestamp to listen in context.

Stoma Use in Hirschsprung Disease: Necessity Versus Avoidance

The points where the speakers disagreed, with each position presented side by side. Written by Kai from the episode transcript and reviewed before publishing.

For specialists · Points of disagreement · AI-written, human-reviewed

The Question

Should stoma formation be a routine part of Hirschsprung disease management, or should it be reserved only for specific complications? A Sheffield series reporting 47% pre-pull-through stoma rates 5:35 stands in sharp contrast to contemporary US practice, where most patients proceed directly to pull-through without diversion.

The Case for Selective Stoma Use

The Sheffield approach reflects what one discussant characterized as "real life surgical reporting" representing overall Hirschsprung management within the UK 6:35. In their cohort of 95 patients from 2004 to 2021 5:25, 47% required stoma before primary pull-through 5:35, with washout failure accounting for nearly 40% of initial stoma indications 5:46. Of the 38 ileostomies and remaining colostomies placed in this group 5:41, the distribution suggests a pragmatic response to clinical circumstances rather than protocol-driven decision-making.

The post-pull-through stoma data adds nuance: of 20 patients requiring stoma formation after their pull-through, 7 occurred within 30 days and 13 after 30 days 6:19. Most of the late stomas addressed constipation or soiling 6:28 — functional outcomes that a pre-emptive stoma might not prevent. As one discussant stated: "Stomma doesn't mean always a failure. Sometimes it's a necessity. Comes with the nature of the disease" [q5].

The Case for Primary Pull-Through

US practice typically involves neonatal pull-through or home irrigations with pull-through in the first months of life 7:20. Pre-pull-through diversion is typically reserved for delayed presentation with perforation or complicated cardiac cases 7:39. One discussant noted that the Sheffield data "does not seem reflective at all of the type of things that that we see in our practice here, and I think that would be seen in a lot of practices in the United States" [q6].

This approach prioritizes avoiding the morbidity of stoma creation and closure — two additional operations with their own complication profiles. When families can manage home irrigations, the infant proceeds to definitive repair without the intermediate step of diversion. The technical approach differs as well: Sheffield primarily performs Duhamel pull-throughs while Cincinnati primarily performs Swenson procedures 8:10, though both can achieve good outcomes.

Where They Agree

Neither position advocates for universal stoma use or universal avoidance. The Sheffield series demonstrates that just over half of patients proceeded directly to pull-through. The US approach acknowledges specific indications — perforation, cardiac complexity — where diversion is appropriate. Both recognize that some patients will require post-pull-through stoma for functional problems that the initial operation did not resolve.

The disagreement is not about whether stomas have a role, but about the threshold for using them. Sheffield's 40% washout failure rate as a stoma indication 5:46 suggests a lower threshold for abandoning medical management, while the US approach extends the trial of home irrigations further before proceeding to either pull-through or diversion.

What Would Resolve It

One discussant observed: "I think this paper just demonstrates the wide variability in practice around the world. I mean, I guess it depends a lot on the healthcare system, uh, on the individual practices, and, and also just traditional approaches" [q7]. The healthcare system variable is not trivial — home irrigations require family capacity, reliable follow-up, and geographic proximity to the treating center. A family living hours from the hospital may not be a candidate for the same management as one living nearby.

What remains unresolved is whether the functional outcomes — the constipation and soiling that drove 13 late stomas in the Sheffield series 6:19 6:28 — differ between the two approaches. If primary pull-through patients ultimately require the same rate of diversion for functional problems, then avoiding the initial stoma only delays the inevitable. If they do not, then the US approach spares a subset of patients two additional operations. The Sheffield data cannot answer this because it does not report functional outcomes in the non-diverted group, and the US practice pattern is not captured in a comparable series.

Takeaways from this story

  • Sheffield's 47% pre-pull-through stoma rate contrasts sharply with US practice, where diversion is reserved for perforation or cardiac complexity.
  • Washout failure drove 40% of Sheffield's initial stomas, suggesting a lower threshold for abandoning medical management than typical US practice.
  • Most post-pull-through stomas occurred after 30 days for constipation or soiling, functional problems a pre-emptive stoma might not prevent.
  • Healthcare system differences — family capacity for home irrigations, distance from hospital — may drive practice variation more than evidence.

Topic overview

Three research fellows from Cincinnati Children's Hospital review articles from the February 2023 Journal of Pediatric Surgery BAPS (British Association of Pediatric Surgery) issue. The discussion covers thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair techniques from a Polish center performing exclusively minimally invasive repairs since 2005, stoma utilization patterns in Hirschsprung disease management at a UK center where 47% of patients required stomas before primary pull-through, and a randomized controlled trial from Tanzania demonstrating that preoperative soap bathing reduced surgical site infection rates from 40.6% to 11.4% and decreased hospital length of stay from 22 to 12 days.

Key takeaways

  • Thoracoscopic EA repair is feasible as exclusive approach; Polish center achieved 1-hour operative times with zero conversions since 2005. (1:38)
  • 47% of UK Hirschsprung patients required pre-pull-through stoma, most commonly for washout failure—higher than typical US practice. (5:35)
  • Preoperative soap bathing reduced SSI from 40.6% to 11.4% and cut hospital stay from 22 to 12 days in Tanzania RCT. (9:26)
  • Centralization improves EA outcomes; Polish center handles 15-20 cases/year as national referral site for complex cases. (3:06)

Keywords

Hashtags

Transcript

Click "Show Transcript" to view the full text (11024 characters)

Comments

Loading comments...