Timing of enterostomy closure for neonatal isolated intestinal perforation

Space: StayCurrentMD Author: Patrick C Bonasso, M. Sidney Dassinger, Steven C. Mehl, Yevgeniya Gokun, Marie S. Gowen, Jeffrey M. Burford, Samuel D. Smith Published:

Author / Expert

Patrick C Bonasso, M. Sidney Dassinger, Steven C. Mehl, Yevgeniya Gokun, Marie S. Gowen, Jeffrey M. Burford, Samuel D. Smith

Topic overview

Abstract

Purpose

No consensus guidelines exist for timing of enterostomy closure in neonatal isolated intestinal perforation (IIP). This study evaluated neonates with IIP closed during the initial admission (A1) versus a separate admission (A2) comparing total length of stay and total hospital cost.

Methods

Using 2012 to 2017 Pediatric Health information System (PHIS) data, 359 neonates with IIP were identified who underwent enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure. Two hundred sixty-five neonates (A1) underwent enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure during the same admission. Ninety-four neonates (A2) underwent enterostomy creation at initial admission and enterostomy closure during subsequent admission. For the A2 neonates, total hospital length of stay was calculated as the sum of hospital days for both admissions. A1 neonates were matched to A2 neonates in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Multivariate models were used to compare the two matched pair groups for length of stay and cost comparisons.

Results

Prior to matching, the basic demographics of our study population included a median birthweight of 960 g, mean gestational age of 29.5 weeks, and average age at admission of 4 days. Eighty-seven pairs of neonates with IIP were identified during the matching process. Neonates in A2 had 91% shorter total hospital length of stay compared to A1 neonates (HR: 1.91; 95% CI for HR: 1.44–2.53; p 

Keywords

Hashtags

1 Views
0 Comments

Comments

Loading comments...