30 views 0 likes

StayCurrentMD

GCMD Space · View profile →

Pectus - Surgical Approaches for Failed Repair

Video Published 2018-11-10 Updated 2022-08-22

Timestops (7)

Topic Overview

A surgical discussion focused on revision pectus excavatum repair, primarily addressing failed Nuss and Ravitch procedures. The speakers examine technical causes of failure—bar rotation, lateral stripping, early removal—and present strategies for complex revisions including forced sternal elevation with a Roux retractor, intercostal space reinforcement with FiberWire sutures, multiple-bar techniques, and selective osteotomies. Cases of malunion, chest wall hernias, and floating sternum after open repair are reviewed, with emphasis on anterior plating and reconstruction using methylmethacrylate or bone graft. The discussion underscores that revision surgery carries significant complexity, chronic pain is common, and the best outcome depends on correct execution of the initial operation.

Key Takeaways

  • 30% of revision cases need 3 bars to distribute pressure and reduce pain in stiff adult chests. (7:44)
  • Forced sternal elevation with Roux retractor + FiberWire rib reinforcement prevents bar drop-in during revision. (6:05)
  • In adults >30, 11-12% require osteotomies when forced elevation fails; bars alone cannot lift rigid chests. (19:28)
  • Redo open repairs with malunion need anterior plating + bone graft/methylmethacrylate; bars alone cause recurrence. (31:54)
  • Chronic pain persists in many revision cases despite stabilization; patients never return to completely normal. (39:25)

Inside this episode

Kai, the Library's AI content creator, listened to this episode and mapped who's speaking, the chapters, key claims, and cases. Every item links to the exact moment in the recording.

AI-enriched

Who's speaking

  • Speaker 1 — host
  • Don — guest
  • Doctor Garcia — guest
  • Speaker 4

Chapters

  • 0:00Introduction and Early Nuss Repair in Young Patients — Brief discussion of a 5-year-old Marfan patient with severe pectus who underwent Nuss procedure, transitioning into revision surgery overview.
  • 2:48Nuss Revision: Technical Failures and Solutions — Don reviews recurrence mechanisms in Nuss procedures—bar rotation, lateral stripping, early removal—and presents techniques including forced sternal elevation, intercostal reinforcement, and multiple-bar strategies.
  • 14:18Case Examples: Nuss Revisions with Multiple Bars and Reinforcement — Three revision cases demonstrating use of Roux retractor, FiberWire reinforcement, shorter bars, and multiple-bar placement to correct failed primary Nuss repairs.
  • 18:46Osteotomies and Hybrid Repairs for Rigid Chests — Don describes indications for releasing osteotomies when forced elevation fails, hybrid technique combining limited cartilage release with Nuss bars, and anterior plating for stability.
  • 23:41Malunion and Chest Wall Hernia After Open Repair — Discussion of catastrophic open repair failures: malunion, pseudoarthrosis, floating sternum, and large chest wall defects. Reconstruction strategies include anterior plating, bone graft, methylmethacrylate, and biologic mesh.
  • 34:29Complex Revision Cases: Hernia, Bioridge Complications, and Reconstruction — Four detailed cases: malunion with paradoxical movement, large anterior hernia with omental flap, failed Bioridge plating with inflammatory mass, and expiratory collapse with lung herniation.
  • 42:00Limits of Revision Surgery and Chronic Pain — Discussion of when multiple revisions become futile, chronic pain as a persistent problem, and the principle that the best operation is the first operation done correctly.

Key claims

  • 1:01About 30% of Don's practice consists of revision pectus cases, not all his own primary repairs. — Don
  • 1:20True recurrence incidence after pectus repair is unknown because many patients do not report back to centers. — Don
  • 1:50In a UCLA adult open repair series with reported 5% recurrence, at least 20 patients contacted Don over 10 years wanting revision for recurrence. — Don
  • 2:23Nuss revision failures are typically due to technical issues: bar positioning, bar rotation, and premature removal. — Don
  • 2:33Open repair failures involve different mechanisms: healing issues, malunion, and regression. — Don
  • 3:25Once Nuss bars rotate, their ability to elevate the chest wall is lost and they usually cause pain. — Don
  • 3:44Lateral stripping of Nuss bars is the most common problem Don sees in adults; the bar migrates posteriorly inside the chest, losing forward elevation. — Don
  • 4:52In adult pectus, the chest is often so stiff and rigid that intercostal spaces cannot support bar pressure, leading to rib spreading and bar drop-in. — Don
  • 5:22Don uses forced sternal elevation, intercostal space reinforcement, medial bar fixation, multiple bars, and releasing osteotomies as revision strategies. — Don
  • 6:05The Roux retractor (rule track) is a bone clamp attached to the sternum that lifts and elevates the chest during dissection, creating open space for bar passage. — Don
  • 6:48Don now uses the Roux retractor on all cases for safety and ease, not just complicated ones. — Don
  • 7:04FiberWire (woven PTFE suture) is used in figure-of-eight around ribs and bar to prevent rib separation and bar drop-in. — Don
  • 7:44About 30% of Don's patients now receive three bars to balance pressure and reduce pain in heavier, stiffer chests. — Don
  • 8:02Don uses FiberWire sutures (not stabilizers) to catch at least three ribs, and for low bars drills through the sternum to loop suture around sternum and bar to prevent rotation. — Don
  • 19:14In adults under 30, almost all patients could be elevated with the Roux retractor and Lorenz dissector; only a couple could not lift. — Don
  • 19:28In adults over 30, 88.7% could be elevated with forced techniques, but 11-12% would not lift and required osteotomies. — Don
  • 20:33If the chest does not lift with forced elevation, bars alone will not make it lift—they are not strong enough. — Don
  • 20:52Don performs a mini-osteotomy by making small incisions and freeing cartilages from the sternum at sites that do not lift, then shortening cartilages to allow reapproximation. — Don
  • 23:13Don now places small plates across osteotomy sites to prevent cosmetic knobbing and achieve better healing. — Don
  • 24:39In older patients with calcified cartilage, the cartilage-sparing perichondrial technique is often not feasible; a slicing osteotomy and segment removal is required. — Don
  • 26:01Osteotomies must be done open; thoracoscopic cartilage removal is possible but very difficult and requires stabilization with sutures or plates. — Don
  • 30:15Redo open repairs fall into three categories: those that fell in without support (can re-Nuss), those that are fixed (require osteotomies), and disasters with chest wall holes and malunion. — Don
  • 30:42Patients with evidence of hernia, malunion, or thoracic dystrophy automatically require open repair. — Don
  • 31:40Don preps all redo open cases with groins exposed in case life-threatening bleeding occurs, allowing femoral bypass access. — Don
  • 31:54Don plates all redo open cases anteriorly in addition to posterior bars, because early experience showed recurrence after bar-only support. — Don
  • 33:05Malunion or pseudoarthrosis is best assessed by physical exam; CT scans may not fully reveal the extent of instability. — Don
  • 33:53Patients with malunion can have near-normal Haller index but severe symptoms: pain, inability to Valsalva, and paradoxical chest wall movement. — Don
  • 34:16Reconstruction of malunion requires stabilization with plating, often bone graft or methylmethacrylate to fill spaces, and sometimes mesh. — Don
  • 35:32In thin patients with atrophied pectoralis muscles, biologic mesh is placed over plates to ensure soft tissue coverage and prevent exposure. — Don
  • 37:15Methylmethacrylate can be used to fashion and recreate lower chest wall segments that have necrosed out, secured with plating. — Don
  • 39:25Chronic pain is a big problem in revision cases; stabilizing and fixing sometimes resolves pain, but not always. — Don
  • 40:07A patient with expiratory chest wall collapse had a Haller index of 2.2 on inspiration but 5.0 on expiration, with lung herniating through the chest wall. — Don
  • 41:28Revision patients are never completely normal again; the best goal is to make them better. — Don
  • 42:05If bars are placed and then removed with subsequent collapse, there are underlying issues that must be addressed before further bar placement. — Don
  • 42:28In patients with connective tissue disorders or chests that will not heal, repeated operations can lead to infections, osteonecrosis, and a cycle of chasing problems. — Don
  • 43:20The best operation is the first operation; correct execution initially is critical to avoid revision complications. — Doctor Garcia
  • 43:49The Nuss procedure has a significant learning curve and is not a see-one-do-one operation. — Doctor Garcia

Cases discussed

  • 8:3528-year-old with failed Nuss repair two years prior, severe pain, residual defect, Haller 4.6, rotated bar, palpable stabilizer.
  • 9:5420-year-old with single bar placed initially, second bar added at 6 months, failed elevation, developed left carinatum, severe chronic pain.
  • 11:3349-year-old woman, two prior Nuss attempts, three OR trips, bleeding complication, severe pain, cardiac compression from bar, Haller 4.9.
  • 32:1745-year-old male, Ravitch two years prior, Haller now 8.3 (two points higher than pre-op), severe recurrence.
  • 34:3028-year-old male, Ravitch at age 15, chronic chest pain since, severe malunion on exam, Haller 3.4, paradoxical movement with cough.
  • 36:1662-year-old male runner, prior Ravitch with excision, two pectus bars in situ, large anterior chest wall hole, heart visible with running.
  • 37:5847-year-old woman, Ravitch with Bioridge plating one year prior, severe chronic pain, Haller 4.0, inflammatory fibrous mass on CT.
  • 39:4650-year-old male trumpet player, Ravitch with revision three years prior, on disability, chronic narcotics, cannot play trumpet, Haller 2.2 on inspiration but 5.0 on expiration.

Open questions

  • How long should bars remain in patients with connective tissue disorders to prevent recurrence?
  • What is the true incidence of recurrence after pectus repair when long-term follow-up is complete?
  • At what point do multiple revisions become futile in patients with persistent chest wall instability?
  • Can thoracoscopic cartilage removal with rongeurs achieve the same precision and stability as open osteotomy with plating?
  • What is the optimal approach for horns of sternum deformity combining carinatum and excavatum features?
This episode was analyzed and enriched by Kai, the Library's AI content creator. Every item links to the moment it comes from — click a timestamp to listen in context.
Written for:

Keywords

Hashtags

Transcript

Comments

Loading comments…