Contemporary Trends in Laparoscopy and Ovarian Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Torsion in the Pediatric Population

Topic overview

New article you should know about by Kim Priban

"Contemporary Trends in Laparoscopy and Ovarian Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Torsion in the Pediatric Population"

Authors: Carlos Theodore Huerta 1Cindy Rodriguez, Joshua Parreco, Chad M. Thorson, Juan E. Sola, Eduardo A. Perez

Full Article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.042

Purpose

Although total oophorectomy (TO) was historically performed in cases of nonviable-appearing ovaries, considerable evidence has demonstrated equivalent outcomes after ovarian sparing surgery (OSS) as well as long-term fertility preservation benefits. This study sought to compare outcomes of OSS and TO for patients with ovarian torsion.

Methods

Females <21 years old admitted for ovarian torsion were identified from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016–2018) and stratified by OSS or TO. Propensity score-matched analysis (PSMA) utilizing >50 covariates (demographics, medical comorbidities, ovarian diagnoses, etc.) was constructed between those receiving TO and OSS.

Results

There were 3,161 females (median 15 [12–18] years) with ovarian torsion, and concomitant pathologies included cysts (42%), benign masses (25%), and malignant masses (<1%). Open approaches were more common (52% vs. 48% laparoscopic), and ovarian resection (OSS or TO) was performed in 87% (39% OSS and 48% TO). OSS was more commonly performed with laparoscopic detorsions (60% vs. 40% TO), while TO was more frequent in open operations (59% vs. 41% TO; both p < 0.001). No differences in overall readmissions (7% OSS vs. 8% TO) or readmissions for recurrent torsion (<1% overall) and ovarian masses (<1%) were observed (both groups <1%; p = 0.612). After PSMA, laparoscopy was still utilized less frequently with TO (39% vs. 53%; p < 0.001) despite similar rates of malignant masses.

Conclusions

Overall, these data offer additional support for the current practice guidelines that give preference to OSS as the primary method of treatment for pediatric ovarian torsion in the majority of cases.

Level of Evidence

III.

Type of Study

Retrospective Comparative Study.

Intended audience: Healthcare professionals and clinicians.