Does Creating a Dome Reduce Recurrence in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Following Patch Repair?

Space: StayCurrentMD Author: Mariatu A. Verla, Candace C. Style, Timothy C. Lee, Alicia D. Menchaca, Patricio E. Lau, Amy R. Mehollin-Ray, Caraciolo J. Fernandes, Sundeep G. Keswani, Oluyinka O. Olutoye Published:

Author / Expert

Mariatu A. Verla, Candace C. Style, Timothy C. Lee, Alicia D. Menchaca, Patricio E. Lau, Amy R. Mehollin-Ray, Caraciolo J. Fernandes, Sundeep G. Keswani, Oluyinka O. Olutoye

Topic overview

Abstract

Purpose

: To develop a quantifiable approach to identify a dome shape of the repaired diaphragm using post-operative chest radiograph and to determine if a dome-shaped prosthetic patch repair is associated with a decreased rate of CDH recurrence.

Methods

: We conducted a retrospective review of all neonates evaluated at our institution from January 2004 to August 2017 with left- and right-sided CDH with at least 6 months of follow-up after CDH repair. Patch use, post-operative imaging and postnatal outcomes were analyzed. Neonates with patch repair were divided into two groups based on the presence of a dome. Using postoperative chest radiographs, the presence of a dome was classified as having a vertical-horizontal diaphragm ratio (VHDR) greater than 20%. Primary outcome was CDH recurrence after repair.

Results

: We identified 192 neonates who met our inclusion criteria. Cohort survival was 96%, recurrence rate was 15%, 78% had a left-sided CDH; 54% received a patch repair, of which 58% had a type C defect. Of the 104 infants with patch repairs, the CDH recurrence rate was 22% (n=23) at a median age of 8.5 months (3.8, 20.1). Although neonates with a dome repair had more ECMO use and longer hospital stay, their recurrence rate was about half of those with a non-dome repair (14% vs 28%, p=0.07).

Conclusions

: A dome-shaped repair may reduce recurrence following prosthetic patch repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A larger, multi-institutional study is needed to statistically validate this clinically significant observation.

Type of Study

: Retrospective Review

Level of Evidence

: III

Keywords

Hashtags

0 Views
0 Comments

Comments

Loading comments...