Transfascial Temporary Fixation is Associated with an Increased Rate of Return to the Operating Room after Gastrostomy Tube Dislodgement When Compared to the Subcutaneous Stay Suture Technique: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis
Topic overview
This retrospective study compares two gastrostomy tube fixation methods in pediatric patients, finding that transfascial temporary fixation leads to higher rates of return to the operating room following tube dislodgement compared to subcutaneous stay sutures. The research addresses a common postoperative complication affecting 10-43% of pediatric gastrostomy patients.
Key takeaways
- Gastrostomy tube dislodgement occurs in 10-43% of pediatric cases, representing a significant postoperative complication.
- Transfascial temporary fixation increases the rate of return to OR compared to subcutaneous stay suture technique.
- Understanding fixation technique choice can help reduce morbidity from gastrostomy tube dislodgement in children.
- Single-institution data suggests subcutaneous stay sutures may be superior for preventing complications requiring reoperation.
Keywords
Hashtags
Full article text
Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Transfascial Temporary Fixation is Associated with an Increased Rate of Return to the Operating Room after Gastrostomy Tube Dislodgement When Compared to the Subcutaneous Stay Suture Technique: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2026-05-07. https://library.globalcastmd.com/article/12016
Comments