Update Course Rewind 2025: Perineal Body–Preserving PSARP: The New Standard?
Topic overview
In this Update Course Rewind from the 13th Annual Update Course in Pediatric Surgery, Drs. Nelson Rosen, Annie Le-Nguyen, Elizabeth Speck, Aaron Garrison, and Jamie Harris explore a key surgical debate: classic PSARP vs. the perineal body–preserving approach for anorectal malformations.
Key Highlights:
Technique Comparison:
The perineal body–preserving PSARP is gaining traction, with many surgeons adopting it as an alternative to the traditional approach, while classic PSARP remains widely used.
Early Outcomes Data:
Recent studies (2023) show promising results for the perineal body–preserving technique, including no dehiscence, no prolapse, and relatively low rates of anal stricture requiring revision.
Postoperative Recovery:
Patients undergoing the perineal body–preserving approach may benefit from shorter hospital stays, with many discharged as early as postoperative day one.
Technical Considerations:
While effective, the approach can be technically more challenging, particularly when identifying anterior anatomy and protecting the posterior vaginal wall.
Flexibility in Approach:
Surgeons emphasized that conversion to a standard PSARP is always appropriate if there is any uncertainty about anatomy or safety during the procedure.
This session highlights that while newer techniques show promise, surgeon judgment and adaptability remain critical to achieving safe and effective outcomes.
Comments