Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic versus Open Repair for Rectobulbar Fistula in Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Topic overview
This systematic review compares laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) with traditional posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) specifically for rectobulbar fistula in male patients with anorectal malformations. Unlike previous meta-analyses that mixed different ARM subtypes, this study focuses exclusively on RBF to provide clearer evidence on the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive approaches.
Key takeaways
- LAARP for male recto-bulbar fistula shows comparable safety to PSARP but requires subtype-specific outcome data
- Previous meta-analyses pooled heterogeneous ARM subtypes, limiting applicability to RBF-specific surgical planning
- Approach-specific complications in LAARP warrant careful patient selection and technical expertise in pediatric centers
- RBF-focused systematic review addresses gap in evidence for laparoscopic versus open repair decision-making
- Surgical approach choice for RBF should consider technique-specific complication profiles beyond general ARM outcomes
Keywords
Hashtags
Full article text
Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic versus Open Repair for Rectobulbar Fistula in Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2026-03-06. https://library.globalcastmd.com/article/11637
Comments