Patch Repair Versus Flap Repair for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Topic overview
This systematic review compares prosthetic patch repair versus autologous muscle flap repair for large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects in neonates. The meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on repair durability and perioperative safety to guide surgical decision-making when primary closure is not feasible.
Key takeaways
- Large CDH defects require non-primary repair using either prosthetic patch or autologous muscle flap techniques.
- Comparative effectiveness data between patch and flap repair methods remains limited and uncertain.
- Systematic review focuses on durability and perioperative safety outcomes in neonatal CDH repair.
- Choice between patch versus flap repair lacks clear evidence-based guidance for surgeons.
Keywords
Hashtags
Full article text
Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Patch Repair Versus Flap Repair for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2026-01-13. https://library.globalcastmd.com/article/11380
Comments