Surgical modifications of the Kasai hepatoportoenterostomy minimize invasiveness without compromising short- and medium-term outcomes
Author / Expert
Topic overview
Abstract
Background
Biliary atresia (BA) causes progressive fibrosis and obliteration of the biliary tree, resulting in bile stasis and eventual liver dysfunction. It affects 1 in 10,000–18,000 infants, and if left untreated, universally leads to liver failure. The Kasai hepatoportoenterostomy (KPE) was developed as an effective surgical therapy for BA and can restore bile drainage into the intestine. Traditionally, the KPE procedure extra-corporealizes the liver to expose the portal plate. Here, we describe modifications to the procedure via a smaller incision in which the liver remains within the abdominal cavity and we compare the outcomes of this technique to previous institutional outcomes and to contemporary international series.
Materials and methods
We identified all patients who underwent KPE for BA at a single institution between 1994 and 2012. Patient outcomes after the modified KPE performed from 2004 to 2012 were compared to data from infants who underwent the traditional KPE from 1994 to 2003.
Results
Ninety-nine patients were identified. Fifty-two were in the traditional KPE group and 47 in the modified KPE group. There was no difference in mean age at surgery. Median follow-up was 64 months (traditional KPE) and 46 months (modified KPE). The rate of native liver survival (39.1% vs 48.5%), overall survival (89.2% vs 97.8%), liver transplant occurring under one year of age (36.5% vs 40.4%) and median time to liver transplant (188 vs 172 days) were not statistically different between groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The results of the modified KPE compared favorably to published outcomes.
Conclusion
The described modifications to the KPE appear to yield equivalent outcomes when compared to the traditional KPE procedure and compare well with published outcomes in the literature. It is possible that the procedure described here results in less scarring and technically easier liver transplant procedures.
Level of Evidence
Level III.
Comments