Meaningful viscoelastic abnormalities in abusive and non-abusive pediatric trauma
Author / Expert
Topic overview
Abstract
Background/Purpose
There remains a lack of data on the utility of viscoelastic tests in managing abused patients. We hypothesize that abnormalities on admission thrombelastography (TEG) will differ in abused patients compared to those accidentally injured.
Methods
Pediatric trauma patients (≤10 years old) who had an admission TEG at a Level I pediatric trauma center (2010–2020) were included and stratified into two cohorts: abuse versus accidental trauma. TEG abnormalities were based on the institution's normative values and compared between the groups.
Results
Of 41 children included, 21 sustained abuse. Five abused patients and three accidentally injured patients died. Abused children showed a hypercoagulable pattern on viscoelastic testing with TEG when compared to those accidentally injured, as demonstrated by a short R-time (67% vs. 30%, p = 0.040) and an increased alpha angle (47% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the MA and LY30 values between the two groups. In a multivariable model, only an abnormal alpha angle remained associated with abuse [odds ratio (OR) 0.17 (confidence intervals (CI) 0.02–0.92)]. In a separate multivariable model, only an abnormal MA was associated with mortality [OR 18.97 (CI 1.93–475.47), p = 0.025].
Conclusions
Our data suggest that hemostasis is significantly different in abused children relative to those who are accidentally injured.
Type of Study
Retrospective Comparative Study.
Level of Evidence
Level III.
Comments