Outcomes following adoption of a standardized protocol for abscess drain Management in Pediatric Appendicitis

Space: StayCurrentMD Author: Lindsay M. Eysenbach, Michael G. Caty, Emily R. Christison-Lagay, Robert A. Cowles, Brian Dillon, Thomas Robin Goodman, Doruk E. Ozgediz, David H. Stitelman, Daniel G. Solomon Published:

Author / Expert

Lindsay M. Eysenbach, Michael G. Caty, Emily R. Christison-Lagay, Robert A. Cowles, Brian Dillon, Thomas Robin Goodman, Doruk E. Ozgediz, David H. Stitelman, Daniel G. Solomon

Topic overview

Abstract

Background/purpose

Though evidence-based clinical pathways for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric appendicitis have been established, protocols guiding management of percutaneous abscess drains are lacking. We hypothesized a drain management protocol utilizing drain output and clinical factors instead of fluoroscopic drain studies would reduce interventional radiologic procedures without adversely impacting clinical outcomes.

Methods

A standardized protocol was uniformly adopted at a tertiary-care children's hospital in April 2016. A retrospective chart review included all cases of appendicitis requiring abscess drainage by interventional radiology three years pre- and postprotocol implementation.

Results

Fifty-eight patients (preprotocol = 39, postprotocol = 19) underwent percutaneous abscess drainage, of whom 52 (preprotocol = 34, postprotocol = 18) required a drain. Baseline demographics and clinical presentation were similar across groups. Following protocol implementation, total number of IR procedures decreased from 2.4 to 1.3 per patient (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the number of postprocedure diagnostic imaging studies, readmissions, or inpatient days, and there was a trend towards a decrease in number of drain days (10.7 to 5.7, p = 0.067).

Conclusion

A standardized protocol for management of abscess drains for complicated appendicitis reduced the number of IR procedures without a negative impact on clinical outcomes or increase in alternative imaging studies. This approach may decrease radiation exposure, anesthetic administration, and resource utilization.

Type of study

Treatment study (retrospective comparative study).

Level of evidence

Level III.

Keywords

Hashtags

0 Views
0 Comments

Comments

Loading comments...