Is the pleating technique superior to the invaginating technique for plication of diaphragmatic eventration in infants?
Author / Expert
Topic overview
Abstract
Backgrounds
The pleating technique is widely used in plication but is difficult to perform with thoracoscopy because of its complex procedure and the limited surgical space. Thus, the invaginating technique was introduced to facilitate thoracoscopic surgery and is now widely used in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) plication. However, the usefulness of the invaginating technique in children has not been established because of the lack of data on long-term outcomes after surgery using the technique.
Methods
From March 2007 to December 2017, 21 patients who were surgically treated for congenital diaphragmatic eventration and phrenic nerve palsy after congenital cardiac surgery were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical method used (pleating technique: 10 patients, invaginating technique: 11 patients). We evaluated the patients for postoperative outcomes and recurrence of diaphragmatic eventration over 5 years. Postoperative recurrence of diaphragmatic eventration was confirmed by calculating the ratio of the eventration level between the eventrated and normal diaphragms.
Results
In the 21 patients who underwent diaphragmatic plication, the pleating and invaginating techniques were used in 10 and 11 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 63.4 ± 48.4 months (pleating group [P] vs invaginating group [I]: 89.1 ± 52.4 vs 40.1 ± 30.8 months, p = 0.022). The mean eventration rates in the 21 patients was 26.7% ± 9.1% (P vs I: 26.6% ± 6.1% vs 26.9% ± 11.3%, p = 0.945) before operation and −2.1% ± 7.3% (−2.8% ± 7.5% vs −1.5% ± 7.4%, p = 0.695) in the immediate postoperative period. From the first to the fifth postoperative year, no recurrence of diaphragmatic eventration was found in any of the groups during the follow-up.
Conclusions
The invaginating technique was easier to perform but showed a similar long-term result as compared with the pleating technique in terms of the growth and development of the chest cavity in the pediatric patients in this study. Thus, we recommend that the invaginating technique be applied in VATS plication for children as an alternative to the pleating technique.
Level of evidence
Level III.
Comments