Inappropriate referrals in pediatric surgery

Space: StayCurrentMD Author: Laura A Shinkunas, Caleb J Klipowicz, Erica M Carlisle Published:

Author / Expert

Laura A Shinkunas, Caleb J Klipowicz, Erica M Carlisle

Topic overview

Abstract

Background

Inappropriate referrals consume a significant amount of health-system resources. To optimize referral patterns, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics provide policy statements regarding appropriate surgical referrals. Here, we identify the volume/characteristics of inappropriate referrals to pediatric surgeons.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of new patients evaluated in the Pediatric Surgery Clinic at a university-based, tertiary-care Children's Hospital over 12-months. Demographics, insurance, referring provider/surgeon diagnosis, and referring provider specialty were abstracted and coded as appropriate/inappropriate.

Results

Five hundred nine referrals were identified; 19% were inappropriate. Inappropriate referrals were more common from mid-level providers (OR = 1.97, p = 0.02) and non-pediatric providers (OR = 1.94, p = 0.01) compared to physicians and pediatric providers. Female patients (OR = 1.65, p = 0.03) and younger patients (OR = 0.94, p = 0.002) were more likely to have an inappropriate referral than their older, male peers. Umbilical hernia, chest wall deformity, and GI complaint were the diagnoses most frequently given to inappropriately referred patients. Average distance traveled by patients for an inappropriate referral was 57.8 miles with significant difference in average distance traveled for rural (78 miles; range = 12–199) and urban (42 miles; range = 0–125) patients (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Despite guidelines on appropriate referral patterns, 19% of pediatric surgery referrals are inappropriate. Increased supervision of mid-level providers, training in pediatrics, or referral to a local pediatrician prior to surgical consultation may decrease the rate of inappropriate referrals.

Type of Study

Prognosis.

Level of Evidence

Level II.

Keywords

Hashtags

0 Views
0 Comments

Comments

Loading comments...