The Colorectal Quiz Episode 9: Motility Disorders Part 2
Inside this episode
Kai, the Library's AI content creator,
listened to this episode and mapped who's speaking, the chapters,
key claims, and cases. Every item links to the exact moment in the
recording.
AI-enriched
Inside this episode
Who's speaking
- Amanda Jensen — host
- Rogerardo — host
- Mark Levitt — guest
- Anil Darbari — guest
- Kalib Graham — guest
- Jason Fisher — guest
- Speaker 7
Chapters
- 0:00Introduction and App Promotion — Hosts introduce the episode and promote the Stay Current Pediatric Surgery app for viewing imaging and articles in real time.
- 0:30Case Recap — Recap of a 10-year-old male with chronic constipation, soiling, poor appetite, dilated redundant colon on contrast enema, and absent RAIR on anorectal manometry.
- 1:45Diagnostic Workup: Sitz Marker Study and Manometry — Discussion of colonic transit assessment via Sitz marker study, anorectal manometry parameters (resting pressure, rectal sensitivity, dyssynergia), and their clinical utility.
- 4:35Alternative Diagnostic Modalities — Comparison of Sitz marker study, nuclear scintigraphy, and colonic manometry availability and interpretation, including three motility scenarios: diffusely slow, segmental obstruction, and severely slow transit.
- 6:47Colonic Manometry Deep Dive — Detailed explanation of colonic manometry: high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs), neuropathic vs myopathic patterns, response to stimulants, and distinction between outlet obstruction and true dysmotility.
- 9:55Case Management and Treatment Philosophy — The patient was treated with Malone antegrade enema, Botox, and biofeedback rather than resection. Discussion of the paradigm shift toward mechanical emptying and away from routine colonic resection for motility disorders.
- 12:03Closing Remarks and Joke — Closing thoughts on collaborative care models, weekly joke, and app promotion.
Key claims
- 0:53Water-soluble contrast enema showed a tortuous and redundant colon that was dilated and full of stool — Speaker 7
- 1:03Anorectal manometry showed an absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) — Rogerardo
- 2:04The patient is showing massively dilated colon as a result of colonic dysfunction, although the dilatation is predominantly in the rectal sigmoid — Anil Darbari
- 2:35High resting pressure on manometry might indicate a patient amenable to anal Botox — Kalib Graham
- 3:02Dyssynergia is when patients push from their belly but create a negative pressure at the bottom instead of relaxing the sphincter — Kalib Graham
- 3:15Patients with dyssynergia might benefit from pelvic floor physical therapy or biofeedback — Kalib Graham
- 3:39Sitz marker study is performed by taking markers and obtaining an X-ray at day 5 — Kalib Graham
- 3:48If Sitz markers are scattered throughout the colon or predominantly on the right side, it suggests colonic dysmotility and may warrant colonic manometry — Kalib Graham
- 4:07If all markers are sitting at the bottom of the colon, it fits more with an outlet issue — Rogerardo
- 4:13If all markers have disappeared on day 5 X-ray, the patient did stool even if they reported not stooling — Kalib Graham
- 4:22Sitz markers do not dissolve — Kalib Graham
- 4:38Colonic manometry is not available everywhere, but Sitz marker study should be available pretty much anywhere — Mark Levitt
- 4:51Sitz marker study can be used as a colonic transit study by obtaining X-rays at day 0, 1, 2, and 4 to see transit of markers — Anil Darbari
- 5:17Sitz marker study is not a replacement for colonic manometry — Amanda Jensen
- 5:32Nuclear scintigraphy is available in most centers that have nuclear medicine capacity — Mark Levitt
- 5:40Three colonic motility scenarios: diffusely slow but functional, normal motility with segmental obstruction, and entire colon severely slow and amodal — Mark Levitt
- 6:40Anorectal manometry is the gold standard but is a sophisticated, expensive test not available everywhere — Rogerardo
- 7:07Colonic manometry provides information on peristaltic activity, which is the motion of the colon — Anil Darbari
- 7:21Throughout the day, you should have two really strong contractions throughout your colon called high amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs) — Rogerardo
- 7:32HAPCs start on the right side of the colon in the cecum area and progress distally — Anil Darbari
- 7:45If a patient has two HAPCs during an 18 or 24 hour study period, they do not have colonic dysmotility — Rogerardo
- 8:02Many patients get colonic manometry but the results come back normal — Jason Fisher
- 8:10No one normal or typical gets a colonic motility test — Mark Levitt
- 8:22If the colon moves uniformly with HAPCs throughout, antegrade flush will work well and reliably — Mark Levitt
- 8:38Some patients have a truly outlet issue and their colon is actually normal on manometry — Kalib Graham
- 8:47Manometry can characterize if contractions are well coordinated (neuropathic problem) or low amplitude (myopathic problem) — Kalib Graham
- 9:03Contractions should go from the right side of the colon all the way down to the rectum, but the rectum does not have those same contractions — Kalib Graham
- 9:12In Hirschsprung's patients post pull-through, the rectal sigmoid brake is removed and contractions may go all the way to the sphincters — Kalib Graham
- 9:36If there is no response to stimulants on colonic manometry, the patient does not have normal colonic motility by definition — Anil Darbari
- 10:11The case was concluded to not be Hirschsprung's disease; the absent RAIR was a sampling error — Mark Levitt
- 10:20The surgeon did not re-biopsy because of calretinin positivity — Mark Levitt
- 10:26Anorectal manometry showed the colon was diffusely slow and the problem was the sphincter due to absent RAIR — Rogerardo
- 10:38The patient was offered a Malone for antegrade flushes in combination with Botox and biofeedback physiotherapy — Rogerardo
- 10:50Over time, the colon could probably rehab and the patient may eventually need just laxatives alone — Rogerardo
- 11:00A perfectly good endpoint is to have a mechanically emptying colon, not necessarily weaning to laxatives alone — Mark Levitt
- 11:11Enemas from below or from above (through a Malone or cecostomy) are acceptable long-term management; resection is reserved for failures of conservative therapy — Mark Levitt
- 11:24Patients who fail conservative management are those with slow transit throughout or segmental disease — Rogerardo
- 11:32The vast majority of patients with segmental disease respond to antegrade enema only and never need resection — Mark Levitt
- 12:17A collaborative model between surgery and gastroenterology should be promoted in every center providing colorectal care — Anil Darbari
Cases discussed
- 0:3010-year-old male with chronic constipation, soiling, poor appetite, dilated redundant colon on contrast enema, and absent RAIR on manometry
Points of disagreement
- 11:00Acceptability of long-term mechanical bowel management vs. weaning to oral laxatives
- Mark Levitt: Used to believe failure to wean to laxatives was a failure requiring surgery, but now believes mechanical emptying (enemas from below or MACE) is a perfectly good endpoint and resection is only for failures of conservative therapy.
Open questions
- What is the optimal duration of conservative management (MACE, Botox, biofeedback) before considering colonic resection in refractory cases?
- Can colonic motility improve over time with mechanical emptying, allowing eventual weaning to oral laxatives alone?
- What is the role of nuclear scintigraphy vs. colonic manometry in centers without access to high-end motility testing?
Absent RAIR in a Dilated Colon: When Manometry Misleads
The patient case from this episode, retold from presentation to outcome with the decisions made along the way.
Written by Kai from the episode transcript and reviewed before
publishing.
For specialists · Case narrative · AI-written, human-reviewed
Absent RAIR in a Dilated Colon: When Manometry Misleads
The Presentation
A 10-year-old male presented with chronic constipation, soiling, and poor appetite. Water-soluble contrast enema revealed a tortuous and redundant colon that was dilated and full of stool 0:53. Anorectal manometry showed an absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex 1:03. The combination — massive colonic dilatation with absent RAIR — suggested Hirschsprung's disease. But calretinin staining was positive, ruling out aganglionosis.
The Decision Point
The absent RAIR created diagnostic tension. One path: re-biopsy to definitively exclude Hirschsprung's, despite the positive calretinin. The other: accept the absent RAIR as a sampling error and characterize the actual functional problem. The team chose not to re-biopsy 10:20. The question then became: what is driving this child's presentation — sphincter dysfunction, colonic dysmotility, or both?
The imaging suggested the dilatation was predominantly rectal-sigmoid 2:04, but that distribution alone does not distinguish outlet obstruction from proximal dysmotility with distal accumulation. Anorectal manometry can reveal high resting pressure, which might indicate a patient amenable to anal Botox 2:35. It can also demonstrate dyssynergia — when patients push from their belly but create a negative pressure at the bottom instead of relaxing the sphincter 3:02 — a pattern that responds to pelvic floor physical therapy or biofeedback 3:15.
But the colon itself needed evaluation. A Sitz marker study, performed by taking markers and obtaining an X-ray at day 5 3:39, can distinguish patterns: if markers are scattered throughout the colon or predominantly on the right side, it suggests colonic dysmotility and may warrant colonic manometry 3:48. If all markers sit at the bottom, it fits more with an outlet issue 4:07. If all markers have disappeared on day 5 X-ray, the patient did stool even if they reported not stooling 4:13 — the markers do not dissolve 4:22.
Colonic manometry is not available everywhere, but Sitz marker study should be available pretty much anywhere 4:38. Some centers use it as a colonic transit study by obtaining X-rays at day 0, 1, 2, and 4 to see transit of markers 4:51, though this is not a replacement for colonic manometry 5:17. Nuclear scintigraphy is available in most centers that have nuclear medicine capacity 5:32.
What the surgeon needs to know is one of three colonic motility scenarios: diffusely slow but functional, normal motility with segmental obstruction, or entire colon severely slow and amodal 5:40. Anorectal manometry is the gold standard but is a sophisticated, expensive test not available everywhere 6:40.
Colonic manometry provides information on peristaltic activity, which is the motion of the colon 7:07. Throughout the day, you should have two really strong contractions throughout your colon called high amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs) 7:21. HAPCs start on the right side of the colon in the cecum area and progress distally 7:32. If a patient has two HAPCs during an 18 or 24 hour study period, they do not have colonic dysmotility 7:45. Many patients get colonic manometry but the results come back normal 8:02 — though no one normal or typical gets a colonic motility test 8:10.
If the colon moves uniformly with HAPCs throughout, antegrade flush will work well and reliably 8:22. Some patients have a truly outlet issue and their colon is actually normal on manometry 8:38. Manometry can characterize if contractions are well coordinated (neuropathic problem) or low amplitude (myopathic problem) 8:47. Contractions should go from the right side of the colon all the way down to the rectum, but the rectum does not have those same contractions 9:03. In Hirschsprung's patients post pull-through, the rectal sigmoid brake is removed and contractions may go all the way to the sphincters 9:12. If there is no response to stimulants on colonic manometry, the patient does not have normal colonic motility by definition 9:36.
What Was Done
The case was concluded to not be Hirschsprung's disease; the absent RAIR was a sampling error 10:11. The surgeon did not re-biopsy because of calretinin positivity 10:20. Anorectal manometry showed the colon was diffusely slow and the problem was the sphincter due to absent RAIR 10:26. The patient was offered a Malone for antegrade flushes in combination with Botox and biofeedback physiotherapy 10:38.
What Changes
Over time, the colon could probably rehab and the patient may eventually need just laxatives alone 10:50. But a perfectly good endpoint is to have a mechanically emptying colon, not necessarily weaning to laxatives alone 11:00. Enemas from below or from above (through a Malone or cecostomy) are acceptable long-term management; resection is reserved for failures of conservative therapy 11:11. Patients who fail conservative management are those with slow transit throughout or segmental disease 11:24. The vast majority of patients with segmental disease respond to antegrade enema only and never need resection 11:32. A collaborative model between surgery and gastroenterology should be promoted in every center providing colorectal care 12:17.
Takeaways from this story
- Absent RAIR with positive calretinin can be a sampling error — re-biopsy is not mandatory if clinical picture doesn't fit Hirschsprung's.
- Sitz marker study at day 5 distinguishes colonic dysmotility (scattered markers) from outlet obstruction (markers at bottom) in any center.
- Two HAPCs in 18-24 hours on colonic manometry rules out dysmotility — many symptomatic patients have normal motility studies.
- Mechanical emptying via MACE is an acceptable endpoint — most segmental disease responds to antegrade enema without resection.
Topic overview
A multidisciplinary discussion of a 10-year-old male with chronic constipation, soiling, and absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) on manometry, presenting with a dilated, stool-filled colon on contrast enema. The panel—pediatric surgeons and gastroenterologists from Cincinnati Children's and Children's National—debates diagnostic workup including Sitz marker studies, colonic manometry, and nuclear scintigraphy to distinguish outlet obstruction from colonic dysmotility. The patient was ultimately managed with a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE), Botox to the sphincter, and biofeedback therapy rather than colonic resection, reflecting a shift toward conservative mechanical emptying strategies in motility disorders.
Key takeaways
- Absent RAIR on manometry may reflect sampling error; calretinin-positive biopsy can obviate repeat biopsy in suspected Hirschsprung's. (10:11)
- Sitz markers clustered distally suggest outlet obstruction; scattered or right-sided markers indicate colonic dysmotility warranting manometry. (3:48)
- Two high-amplitude propagating contractions in 18–24 hours on colonic manometry rules out colonic dysmotility. (7:21)
- Antegrade enema (MACE/cecostomy) plus Botox and biofeedback is first-line; colonic resection reserved for conservative therapy failures. (10:38)
- Mechanical emptying via long-term enema is an acceptable endpoint; weaning to oral laxatives alone is not mandatory. (11:00)
Keywords
Hashtags
Transcript
Click "Show Transcript" to view the full text (12833 characters)
Comments