Optimal Outcome Reporting 5 and 8 Years Following Cleft Palate Repair

Infographic · Dec 2025 · 1 min read

In brief

This study introduces optimal outcome reporting (OOR) as a standardized quality metric for cleft palate repair, defining success as normal velopharyngeal function and no fistula after single operation. In a 94-patient cohort, 69-73% achieved OOR at ages 5-8 years, with younger operative age and nonsyndromic status predicting better outcomes.

69% of patients achieved optimal outcome (normal speech, no fistula, single operation) at age 5; this improved to 73% by age 8.
Earlier palatoplasty age, nonsyndromic status, and Veau I/III cleft types were associated with higher optimal outcome rates.
Nine patients with speech deficits at age 5 achieved normal function by age 8 through speech therapy alone, avoiding reoperation.
Optimal Outcome Reporting provides a standardized metric for benchmarking cleft palate surgery quality across surgeons and centers.
Main causes of suboptimal outcomes were velopharyngeal insufficiency requiring secondary surgery and need for multiple operations.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the infographic.

The infographic uses a teal, pink, and lime green color scheme with sections arranged vertically. It features simple illustrations including a baby icon and an open mouth diagram. Key statistics are displayed in large text boxes with contrasting backgrounds, and the layout flows from study design at top to results in middle to conclusion at bottom.

Balkin, Daniel M. MD, PhD; Incorvia, Joseph MScGH; Reed, Brianna BS; Nuzzi, Laura C. BA; Hughes, Christopher D. MD, MPH; Catallozzi, Liza MS, CCC-SLP; Clark, Roseanne MS, CCC-SLP; Kummer, Ann W. PhD, CCC-SLP, FASHA∥; Meara, John G. MD, DMD, MBA

Background:

No widely applied standardized outcome metric exists following palatoplasty. We created a novel quality metric, optimal outcome reporting (OOR), reflecting patients who experienced the best outcome: normal velopharyngeal function and no unintended fistula after a single operation. We assessed OOR at 5 and 8 years of age in a patient cohort.

Methods:

Data collected included sex, ethnicity, Veau classification, syndromic status, operative age, presence of fistulae, and speech assessments at 5 and 8 years. Patients with submucous clefts were excluded.

Results:

The cohort comprised 94 patients. Median operative age was 10 months; 45% were male, 46% were non-White, and 25% had syndromic diagnoses. The most common cleft types were Veau I (32%) and Veau III (28%). At 5 years, 69% (65 of 94) achieved OOR, with suboptimal outcomes due to multiple operations (9), velopharyngeal insufficiency (19), or fistula (1). At 8 years, 73% (61 of 83) met OOR criteria; failures resulted from multiple operations (12), velopharyngeal insufficiency (9), or fistula (1). Patients with OOR were significantly younger at the time of palate repair. A higher proportion of patients with nonsyndromic diagnoses and those with Veau I/III clefts attained OOR compared with patients with syndromic diagnoses and other cleft types. Nine patients with speech-related suboptimal outcomes at 5 years demonstrated optimal outcomes by 8 years with speech therapy alone.

Conclusions:

Cleft palate OOR describes the ideal outcome following primary palatoplasty. This simple surgical outcome metric can be applied to individual surgeons and across centers, facilitating benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives.

The text in the image