StayCurrentMD · Negative pressure wound therapy for small burns: Useful?
Infographic·Published Dec 2020Older

Negative pressure wound therapy for small burns: Useful?

Infographic comparing negative pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment for pediatric burns under 5% BSA

Infographic · Dec 2020

In brief

In brief

Explores the clinical utility and evidence for applying negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the management of small burn injuries, examining potential benefits for healing outcomes.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the infographic.

The infographic uses a red, white, and gray color scheme with a split layout. The left side shows an illustration of a burned hand and kettle representing the injury mechanism. The center and right columns display comparative outcomes using large typography, with red highlighting improved results in the NPWT group. Icons illustrate standard dressing equipment versus NPWT device setup.

The text in the image

NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR SMALL BURNS: USEFUL? | AUSTRALIA | RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL | 2018 - 2019 | STANDARD TREATMENT | WITHOUT (-) | WITH (+) | NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY | < 17 YEARS | 10 DAYS | TIME TO RE-EPITHELIALIZATION | 8 DAYS (↓22%) | BURNS < 5% BSA | 7% | SKIN GRAFTING | 2% | FACIAL BURNS EXCLUDED | 28% | REFERRAL TO SCAR MANAGEMENT | 11% (↓60%) | n= 114 | = | PAIN, ITCH, HYPERTROPHIC SCAR | = | BJS | C C Frear, et al. December, 2020 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11993 | SCPCP SOCIEDAD CHILENA DE CIRUGIA PEDIATRICA | Authors: Constanza Gallardo José Manuel Campos Varas @ignacioponce_design

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this infographic · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →