Guideline document
This guideline is provided for in-page reading only. Please contact the publishing organization for downloadable copies.
0
Views
0
Likes
0
Shares
0
Comments
StayCurrentMD
View profile →
COG Rhabdomyosarcoma Handbook.
Topic overview
Clinical handbook from the Children's Oncology Group covering diagnosis, staging, and treatment protocols for rhabdomyosarcoma, the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children.
Keywords
Hashtags
Full guideline text
Click "Show full text" to view the full text (65061 characters)
HANDBOOK FOR CHILDREN WITH RHABDOMYOSARCOMA
Updated Spring 2014
This handbook represents a synthesis of all guidelines and surgically relevant
information from recent COG protocols for rhabdomyosarcoma. There is a Biology
Protocol, D9902 which is open, but there are no open clinical protocols. This handbook is
organized to eliminate redundancy and provide you with specific data you will need in
treating your patient. The closed COG clinical protocols are ARST 0331 Low Risk (Aug
2012), ARST 0531 Intermediate Risk (May 2013), and ARST 0431 High Risk (Jan 2010).
There is a One Minute Review at the beginning of this handbook that outlines the
bare minimum facts for surgeons going to the OR. It includes assessment of stage and group,
classification into risk groups for placement into the appropriate protocol, surgical
guidelines, and tissue handling.
There follow several sections, including abstracts, objectives and scientific aims from
the three clinical protocols, Pre-Treatment Staging Classification, Designation of Primary
Site, Anatomic Definitions, Grouping Classification, Surgical Guidelines, Pathology
Requirements, and Treatment plans. The clinical protocols share similar surgical guidelines,
so this handbook cites a unified outline of surgically relevant information. (citations are in
parenthesis) The summary of surgeon responsibilities, along with the surgical checklist to be
completed after each case, conclude the handbook
The Surgery Representatives listed below should be contacted if there you have any
questions. David Rodeberg is chair of the Sarcoma Surgical Steering Committee
Low Risk, 0331: Charles Paidas cpaidas@health.usf.edu
Richard Andrassy richard.andrassy@uth.tmc.edu
Intermediate Risk, 0531 David Rodeberg rodeberg.david@chp.edu
Kenneth Brown kbrown@interchange.ubc.ca
Andrea Hayes-Jordan andrea.hayes-ordan@uth.tmc.edu
Charles Paidas cpaidas@health.usf.edu
High Risk, 0431 David Rodeberg rodeberg.david@chp.edu
This document is intended to facilitate compliance with protocol guidelines by
providing relevant information in an easy format. This website will be updated as new
clinical protocols are opened. Any and all suggestions for improvement are welcome.
John J. Doski, MD
UTHSC San Antonio
jjdoski@gmail.com
ONE MINUTE REVIEW
STAGE (PREOPERATIVE)
I Orbit,
Head and Neck (not parameningeal) Any size, node
GU (not bladder/prostate)
Biliary Tract
II Bladder/Prostate
Extremity < 5 cm, node (-)
Parameningeal
Trunk, Retroperitoneal
III Same as II >5 cm and/or node (+)
IV All Metastasis
GROUP (INTRAOPERATIVE)
I Localized disease, completely resected
a. confined to muscle of origin
b. contiguous involvement
II Total gross resection
a. microscopic residual, node (-)
b. no microscopic residual, node (+)
c. microscopic residual, node (+)
III Gross residual disease
a. biopsy only
b. gross resection (>50%)
IV Metastases
RISK GROUPS
Low Risk ARST 0331 Stage I-II, Group I-II embryonal
Stage I, Group III orbit
Intermediate Risk, ARST 0531 Stage II-III, Group III embryonal
Stage I-III, Group I-III, alveolar
High Risk, ARST 0431 Stage IV, Group IV
SURGICAL PRINCIPLES
-Complete resection with confirmed adequate margin with frozen section. (Unless
unacceptable morbidity) Biopsy surrounding if concerned, and mark suspected residual
tumor with small titanium clips. If somatic muscle, excision of entire compartment may not
be required.
-Lymph Nodes: Confirm pathology of nodes if
-clinically positive, with sampling biopsy- open, needle, or sentinel ok.
-clinically negative, but site specific. (i.e extremity)
For boys >10 years or boys < 10 years with CT (+) nodes and paratesticular RMS,
Staging Ipsilateral Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection required.
Radical Dissection not necessary or appropriate.
For intermediate risk tumors, radical debulking of clinically (+) nodes useful to get
regional control. Attempt to sample highest node.
-Placement central venous access prior to initiation of chemotherapy recommended.
PreTreatment Reexcision (PRE)- establish clean margins if possible. PRE determines
group if done prior to chemo/XRT.
Second Look- assess for complete resection of primary tumor at Week 12. (Prior to
XRT, determines if XRT necessary)
For metastatic disease (High Risk), resect pulmonary mets if persist following
chemo/XRT, biopsy nonregional clinically positive nodes, biopsy other sites (bone, liver)
TISSUE HANDLING
All tissue obtained in OR kept fresh, NO FORMALIN
ABSTRACTS
Low Risk, ARST 0331: (low risk, pg 7)
Therapy for low -risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) patients requires further refinement
in order to maximize long -term failure -free survival and minimize short and long -term
toxicity. Two Subsets of low -risk patients have been defined for this protocol; these Subsets
have had excellent outcomes following treatment on IRS -III or IRS-IV. Therapies for these
Subsets consisted of either vincristine plus dactinomycin and radiation therapy to areas of
residual tumor on IRS -III or IRS -IV (Sub set 1), or vincristine, dactinomycin plus
cyclophosphamide (26.4 g/m 2 total cumulative dose) and radiation therapy to areas of
residual tumor on IRS -IV (Subset 2). In the present study, a more modest dose of
cyclophosphamide (4.8 g/m 2 total cumulative dos e) will be given with vincristine plus
dactinomycin and radiation therapy to areas of residual tumor to patients in each of the two
Subsets. In this manner we hope to improve outcome without significant acute or long -term
toxicity for the majority of Subs et 1 patients and to maintain the excellent outcome and
reduce acute and long-term toxicity for patients in Subset 2. The durations of therapy will be
22 weeks for patients in Subset 1 and 46 weeks in Subset 2.
Intermediate Risk, ARST 0531: (int risk, pg 8)
Intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is defined as non -metastatic (Group I -
III) alveolar (RMS) arising at any site (Stage 1 -3) and incompletely excised (Group III)
embryonal RMS arising in an unfavorable site (Stage 2,3). The long -term failure -free
survival (FFS) for intermediate -risk RMS is 65%. To improve long -term survival,
ARST0531 will compare the outcome of patients randomly assigned to either standard
vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) chemotherapy or VAC alternating
with vincristine and irinotecan (VI). Radiotherapy will start at Week 4 of therapy for all
patients (with rare exceptions discussed in the protocol). The local control and FFS for
patients receiving early (Week 4) radiotherapy and VAC chemotherapy will be co mpared to
similar patients treated with delayed (Week 10) radiotherapy and VAC on IRS -IV. In
addition, patients will be eligible for optional studies, including fluoro -deoxy-glucose
positron emission tomography assessment of response, pharmacogenomic corr elations with
VAC and VI toxicity, and gene expression profiles correlation with FFS
High Risk, ARST 0431: (high risk, pg 7)
Patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma have a poor prognosis with an overall
survival rate of approximately 30%. To improve this outcome, ARST0431 will evaluate
intensification of therapy using vincristine/docorubicin/cyclophosphamide (VAC) alternating
with ifosfamide/etoposide (IE) using interval dose compression, comparing outcome to
patients treated on D9802. As local cont rol is critical for optimal management of
rhabdomyosarcoma, ARST0431 will also evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of combining
vincristine/irinotecan (VI) with radiation therapy. Patients will be eligible for optional
studies evaluating the pharmacogenomic correlations with VI toxicity and radiation therapy.
OBJECTIVES AND SCIENTIFIC AIMS
Low Risk, ARST 0331: (low, pg 9)
Primary Objectives:
To estimate the failure-free survival (FFS) for patients with low-risk
rhabdomyosarcoma in Subset 1 (Stage 1, Clinical Group I/II or orbital Clinical Group III, or
Stage 2, Clinical Group I/II) when treated with four courses of VAC with reduced dose
cyclophosphamide followed by four courses of VA plus radiation therapy (reduction in
length of therapy to 22 weeks).
To specifically estimate the FFS for patients with Stage 1, Clinical Group IIB or C
(node positive) or Stage 2, Clinical Group II low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (a subgroup treated
on D9602 with 45 weeks of intensive VAC) when treated as Subset 1 patients using four
courses of VAC with reduced dose cyclophosphamide followed by four courses of VA plus
radiation therapy (reduction in length of therapy to 22 weeks).
To estimate the FFS for patients with low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma in Subset 2 (Stage
1, non-orbital Clinical Group III or Stage 3, Clinical Group I/II) when treated with four
courses of VAC with reduced dose cyclophosphamide followed by 12 courses of VA plus
radiation therapy.
Secondary Objectives:
To estimate local control rates for patients with low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma when
treated with reduced radiation doses (as compared to IRS-IV), including patients with
microscopic residual disease and no regional lymph node involvement who receive 36 Gy,
and those with gross residual orbital tumors who receive 45 Gy.
To determine the rate of second-look surgery in patients with bulk residual tumor at
diagnosis (Clinical Group III) and the proportion of second-look surgeries that render the
patient tumor free or with microscopic tumor only, and to evaluate the pathologic
significance of such residual tumor.
To estimate the local control rates for patients with Clinical Group III disease when
the radiation dose is response-adjusted after second look surgical resection.
INTERMEDIATE RISK, 0531: (int, pg 10)
Primary objective
To compare the early response rates, failure-free survival (FFS), and survival of
patients with intermediate-risk RMS treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and vincristine,
dactinomycin and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine, irinotecan
(VI).
Secondary objectives
To compare FFS, local control, and survival of patients with intermediate-risk
RMS treated with VAC and early (Week 4) radiotherapy compared to delayed (Week 10)
radiotherapy, using IRS-IV for historic comparison.
To compare the acute and late effects of VAC to VAC alternating with VI,
including the toxicity associated with concurrent VI and radiotherapy.
To compare the acute and late effects of VAC as delivered on this study to
D9803 VAC.
To correlate change in FDG PET maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax)
from Week 1 to Week 4 and 15 with FFS.
For VI treated patients, to correlate patient UGT1A1 genotype with VI toxicity.
To correlate patient CYP2B6, CYP2C9 and GSTA1 genotypes with VAC
toxicity.
To prospectively evaluate and validate gene expression values with the intent to
define the best diagnostic predictors and more powerful prognostic classifiers.
HIGH RISK, 0431: (high, pg 9)
Primary Objectives:
To improve the early disease con trol interval for patients with high -risk
rhabdomyosarcoma using an intensive, interval compression therapy that permits maximal
early exposure to known effective agents
To determine the feasibility and assess immediate and short term side effects of
delivery of concurrent irinotecan with irradiation.
Secondary Objectives
To expand the available data for response to irinotecan/vincristine in previously
untreated high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma
To prospectively evaluate and validate gene expression values wit h the intent to
define the best diagnostic predictors and more powerful prognostic classifiers
STAGING (Low, pg 74)
TNM PRE-TREATMENT STAGING CLASSIFICATION
Staging prior to treatment requires thorough clinical examination, laboratory and imaging
examinations. Biopsy is required to establish the histologic diagnosis. Pre -treatment size is
determined by external measurement or MRI or CT depending on the anatomic location. For
less accessible primary sites, CT will be employed as a means of lymph nod e assessment as
well. Metastatic sites will require some form of imaging (but not histologic confirmation,
except for bone marrow examination) confirmation.
Stage Sites T Size N M
1 Orbit T1 or T2 a or b N0 or N1 or Nx M0
Head and neck
(excluding parameningeal)
GU – non-bladder/
non-prostate
Biliary Tract
2 Bladder/Prostate T1 or T2 a N0 or Nx M0
Extremity, Cranial
Parameningeal, Other
(includes trunk,
retroperitoneum, etc.)
Except Biliary tract
3 Bladder/Prostate T1 or T2 a N1 M0
Extremity Cranial b N0 or N1 or Nx M0
Parameningeal, Other
(includes trunk,
retroperitoneum, etc.)
Except Biliary tract
4 All T1 or T2 a or b N0 or N1 M1
Definitions – See Appendix IV for anatomic definitions of parameningeal, orbit and other
head and neck sites
Tumor –
T(site)1 – confined to anatomic site of origin
a.
5 cm in diameter in size
b. > 5 cm in diameter in size
T(site)2 – extension and/or fixative to surrounding tissue
a.
5 cm in diameter in size
b. > 5 cm in diameter in size
Regional Nodes –
N0 regional nodes not clinically involved
N1 regional nodes clinically involved by neoplasm
Nx clinical status of regional nodes unknown (especially sites that preclude lymph node
evaluation
Metastasis –
M0 no distant metastasis
M1 metastasis present
DESIGNATION OF PRIMARY SITE (High, pg 100)
FOR USE IN PRE-TREATMENT STAGING
(Selection of "Site Category" for Patient Entry)
NOTE: This will extend to other areas the guidelines prepared to aid in the identification of
head and neck sites (A ppendix II). Some of the distinctions made below are largely
semantic. Although they do not change therapy, they may be important in reviewing results
for specific sites. Others are vital as they would make a change in stage and therapy in IRS -
V. It is astonishing how frequently data forms on the same patient from the same institution
list quite different primary sites. This can only be determined in retrospect, but it should
make one cautious regarding accepting a confusing or illogical site designati on at the time of
registration.
I. Comment on the Terms Used to Designate Primary Site in the IRS
A. The Dictated Operative Note
If the patient has undergone an initial major operative procedure, the "post -operative
diagnosis: listed on the operative note that should be dictated following the procedure
will ordinarily include reference to site. In such cases, this is usually the most
accurate source document for site designation.
B. Larger Site Categories
Most of the terms used follow common usage. As y ou are aware, we consider an
"extremity" to include the total forequarter or total hindquarter. This extends the
extremity area on the posterior, but not the anterior, aspect of the body. The muscles
over the scapula are included in the upper extremity a nd the muscles making up the
buttocks in the lower extremity. This confines the trunk area posteriorly to that which
is paraspinal and chest wall; and anteriorly, chest wall and abdominal wall. The
retroperitoneal and perineal sites are listed separately in the IRS.
C. Primary Site vs. Areas of Extension
Primary sites rather than areas of extension ordinarily determine the site category. In
the case of the parameningeal tumors, however, the primary site is incidental, and the
approach to the meninges is the important factor in site determination in the IRS.
D. Large Tumors Involving Multiple Organs and/or Structure
Our aim in these cases is to attempt to select the most likely site of original
involvement or origin. The terms "abdominal", "thoracic" an d "unknown" are the
least helpful in analysis.
E. "Bones"
When the designated site on the institutional forms is a word indicating a bone, i.e.
"tibia", "scapula", etc., try for something more accurate or at least make it an
adjective.
II. Specific Sites Within Major Categories
The following is a glossary of site designations. They are almost entirely taken from
IRS I-III forms reviewed by the Committee. Some of them should not be used and
others would appear to need definition. In some cases we have sim ply provided an
explanation of what a surgeon would ordinarily mean by a given term. Site
designations in data collection sheets and even operative notes may be worded in
terms, which are not inaccurate but not appropriate for site designation in the IRS,
where consistency is required.
1. Abdominal Wall
This refers to the anterior abdominal wall from the inferior costal margins
superiorly to the inguinal ligaments and symphysis pubis, inferiorly, and
extends laterally between the costal margin and iliac cr ests to the paraspinal
region. From a practical point of view, this posterior extension is so narrow in
a child that it is probably insignificant as a primary site.
2. Arm
Refers to the area from the shoulder joint to the elbow joint.
3. Bile Ducts
Bile duct is a specific site and can be recognized as such at surgery. This
might also be called "choledochus" or "biliary tract". There is probably no
way one can distinguish an intrahepatic bile duct site from a primary liver site
except by examining the excised specimen.
4. Bladder
Our criteria for identifying the bladder as a primary site has included the
appearance of tumor within the bladder cavity, which can be biopsied through
an endoscope or occasionally at laparotomy. We do not recognize as prim ary
bladder tumors those that simply displace the bladder or distort its shape. The
latter are ordinarily primary pelvic sites, unless otherwise specified.
5. Bladder/Prostate
In approximately 20% of males with bladder or prostatic tumors, the precise
site cannot be determined even at autopsy. The histologic features are similar.
Although it is desirable to have an indication of the "most probable: site from
the institution, and one should strive to get this, it may not be possible.
6. Buttocks - These are extremity lesions.
7. Inguinal Canal (See paratesticular).
8. Liver - See "bile ducts".
9. Paraspinal
When tumors are described as adjacent to the vertebral column, this
designation is preferable to "trunk" or "neck".
10. Paratesticular (testicular)
Rhabdomyosarcomas rarely arise from testicular tissue. These tumors are
almost always "paratesticular" arising either adjacent to the testes within the
scrotum or in the inguinal canal, i.e., "groin" or lower abdominal wall. In
either case they are c lassified in the G. U. major site category and called
paratesticular.
11. Pelvis
This site must be distinguished from the previously designated "special
pelvic" category used in prior IRS studies. It may be regarded as a tumor
within the pelvis when no more specific site is appropriate.
12. Perianal (often called "anus" or "rectum")
These sites are ordinarily "perirectal" or "perianal". They are distinguished
with difficulty from perineal and vulval sites; but the latter distinction is
important.
13. Perineum
This should include the sites that appear anterior to the anus and posterior to
the scrotum in males and posterior to the labia in females. It extends
anteriorly to the base of the scrotum in males and to the introitus in females.
It must be distinguished from labial and vaginal sites.
14. Peritoneum
This primary site is imprecise as it extends from the diaphragm to the pelvis.
One should try for specific site.
15. Prostate -
(See Bladder/Prostate)
16. Retroperitoneal - (often called "psoas muscle")
We reserve the term retroperitoneal for those posteriorly situated abdominal
tumors in which there does not seem to be a more specific site. If the tumor
arose in an abdominal viscus, such as the pancreas, liver, etc., this would be a
preferable site designation, to "retroperitoneal". Tumors in a retroperitoneal
site are in the posterior aspect of the abdomen and/or pelvis. The term
"psoas" as a site is not very specific, as this muscle extends through the
posterior lower abdomen, pelvis, and into the leg.
17. Shoulder
The posterior aspect of the shoulder, i.e., the scapular area, is an extremity
site.
18. Testes –
See Paratesticular
19. Uterus
A tumor in this primary site may be difficult to differentiate from a primary
vaginal site, because a t umor originating in the uterus may fill the vagina.
After a therapeutic response, the distinction is usually clear. In general, there
is wide separation of age ranges between these two groups with the vaginal
cases occurring in infancy or early childhood and the uterine primaries in
adolescents or young adults. One should be skeptical regarding a patient with
a designated "vaginal" site who is over five years of age, or a patient with a
designated uterine site in a patient who is under 10 years of age. Fortunately,
this is not a therapy-related distinction.
20. Vagina
For the purpose of our study the patient with a primary vaginal lesion must
have evidence of a visible tumor on the vaginal surface which can be biopsied
through the vagina. Displacement or distortion of the vagina is not sufficient.
21. Vulva
Primary lesions in this site arise in the labial minor or majora, and these terms
are often used, and are acceptable.
ANATOMIC DEFINITIONS (Low, pg 76)
ANATOMIC DEFINITIONS OF PARAMENINGEAL, ORBIT AND OTHER HEAD AND
NECK SITES FOR USE IN PRE-TREATMENT STAGING
Introduction
There are three groupings of sites in the head and neck: parameningeal; orbit; and all others
(“head and neck”)
PARAMENINGEAL
1. Middle Ear
This refers to a primary tha t begins medial to the tympanic membrane. This tumor is
often advanced at presentation and because of extension laterally may present with a
mass in front of or under the ear suggesting a parotid origin. It may also extend
through the tympanic membrane a nd appear to be arising in the ear canal. When
there is doubt about the site of origin, the “middle ear” designation should be picked
as it implies the more aggressive therapy required.
2. Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses
The three paranasal sinuses are the maxillary sinuses, the ethmoid sinuses, and the
sphenoid sinus. These surround the nasal cavity and primary in one will frequently
extend to another. It can be difficult to determine the exact site of origin but the
choice is academic as the randomi zation is not affected. The site designation will
have a bearing on the design of radiotherapy portals. Tumor arising in the maxillary
or the ethmoid sinuses may invade the orbit. This is much more likely than a primary
in the orbit invading one of the sinuses. When the distinction between orbit and
paranasal sinus is unclear, the site selected should be paranasal sinus as it is the more
likely primary site and requires appropriately more aggressive therapy. A primary
arising in the sphenoid sinus (rar e) may extend inferiorly to involve the nasopharynx.
Again the choice of site is academic as the therapy is not different.
3. Nasopharynx
This refers to the superior portion of the pharynx which is bounded anteriorly by the
back of the nasal septum, super iorly by the sphenoid sinus, inferiorly by a level
corresponding to the soft palate, and laterally and posteriorly by the pharyngeal walls.
4. Infratemporal Fossa/Pterygopalatine and Parapharyngeal Area
This refers to the tissues bounded laterally by the medial lobe of the parotid gland and
medially by the pharynx. Large tumors in this region may extend through the parotid
gland and present as a mass of the lateral face, sometimes extending even to the
cheek. Where there is doubt as to the primary, the pa rameningeal designation should
be chosen as it confers appropriately more aggressive treatment. The superior
boundary of this tissue volume is the base of skull just under the temporal lobe, hence
the term “infratemporal”. The distinction between this an d the “parapharyngeal” area
is academic.
ORBIT
1. Eyelid
This site is sometimes erroneously designated as “eye”. Although there may
occasionally be a case arising from the conjunctiva of the eye, the globe itself is not a
primary site. The eyelid is much less frequent than the orbit itself.
2. Orbit
This refers to the bony cavity, which contains the globe, nerve and vessels, and the
extra ocular muscles. Tumor in this site will only rarely invade the bony walls and
extend into the adjacent sinuses. This is why this tumor which is clearly adjacent to
the skull base and it meninges is not by its natural history appropriate to include in the
parameningeal sites unless there is invasion of the bone.
HEAD AND NECK
1. Scalp
This site includes primaries arisin g apparently in or just below the skin of all the
tissues of the face and head that are not otherwise specified below. This usually
means the scalp, external ear and pinna, the nose and forehead, but not the eyelids or
cheek.
2. Parotid Region
The parotid gland lies just in front of and under the ear and may surround both sides
of the posterior aspect of the ascending ramus of the mandible. Tumors in the parotid
region may not arise in the parotid gland itself. As noted above, large primaries in the
infratemporal fossa may erode through the parotid. A true parotid region primary
should not, on radiographic studies, reveal a mass in the infratemporal fossa.
3. Oral Cavity
This includes the floor of the mouth, the buccal mucosa, the upper and lower gum, the
hard palate, and the oral tongue (that portion of the tongue anterior to the
circumvallate papillae). A primary arising in the buccal mucosa can be impossible to
distinguish from one arising in the cheek but the distinction is academic. This would
also include those lesions arising in and near the lips.
4. Larynx
This refers to the primaries arising in the subglottic, glottic, or supraglottic tissues.
Tumors of the aryepiglottic folds can be difficult to distinguish from the hypopharynx
but the distinction is academic.
5. Oropharynx
This includes tumors arising from the anterior tonsillar pillars, the soft palate, the
base of the tongue, the tonsillar fossa, and oropharyngeal walls. Tumors arising in
the parapharyngeal space may indent the oropharyngea l wall. In this circumstance,
the primary should be considered parameningeal. If the mucosa of the oropharynx
actually contains visible tumor as opposed to being bulged by it, the primary would
be oropharynx. Primaries arising in the tongue base, soft p alate, or tonsillar region
may extend into the oral cavity. The oropharynx designation is preferred.
6. Cheek
This refers to the soft tissues of the face that surround the oral cavity. Tumors arising
in the parotid may invade the cheek. As noted above, the distinction between this and
the buccal mucosa is academic.
7. Hypopharynx
This refers to the pyriform sinus and may be difficult to distinguish from larynx
although the designation is academic with regard to randomization.
8. Thyroid and Parathyroid
Primaries arising in these two sites are exceedingly rare, if they exist at all, and
should those structures be involved, it would more likely be from a primary arising in
an adjacent structure such as the trachea.
9. Neck
This refers to the soft tissues of the lateral neck between the mastoid tip and the
clavicle. It does not include those medial structures such as hypopharynx and larynx
noted above. Unfortunately this site overlaps with the designation “paraspinal”
included under the site group “trunk”. Primaries arising in the neck can and
frequently do behave as a paraspinal primary with direct invasion into the spinal extra
dural space.
GROUPING (High, pg 103)
APPENDIX V: IRS CLINICAL GROUPING CLASSIFICATION
Group I: Localized disease, completely resected
(Regional nodes not involved - lymph node biopsy or dissection is required
except for head and neck lesions)
(a) Confined to muscle or organ of origin.
(b) Contiguous involvement - infiltration outside the muscle or organ of
origin, as through fascial planes.
NOTATION: This includes both gross inspection and microscopic
confirmation of complete resection . Any nodes that may be inadvertently
taken with the specimen must be negative. If the latter should be involved
microscopically, then the patient is placed in the Group IIb or IIc (See below).
Group II: Total gross resection with evidence of regional spread
(a) Grossly resected tumor with microscopic residual disease
(Surgeon believes that he has removed all of the tumor, but the
pathologist finds tumor at the margin of resection and additional
resection to achieve clean margin is not feasible). No evidence of
gross residual tumor. No evidence of regional node involvement.
Once radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy have been started, re -
exploration and removal of the area of microscopic residual does not
change the patient’s group.
(b) Regional disease with involved nodes, completely resected with no
microscopic residual.
NOTATION: Complete resection with microscopic confirmation of no
residual disease makes this different from Groups IIa and IIc.
Additionally, in contrast to Group IIa, regional nodes (which are
completely resected, however) are involved, but the most distal node is
histologically negative.
(c) Regional disease with involved n odes, grossly resected, but with
evidence of microscopic residual and/or histologic involvement of the
most distal regional node (from the primary site) in the dissection.
NOTATION: The presence of microscopic residual disease makes this
group different f rom 2b, and nodal involvement makes this group
different from Group 2a.
Group III: Incomplete resection with gross residual disease
(a) After biopsy only
(b) After gross or major resection of the primary (>50%)
Group IV: Distant metastatic disease present at onset
(Lung, liver, bones, bone marrow, brain, and distant muscle and nodes)
NOTATION: The above excludes regional nodes and adjacent organ
infiltration which places the patient in a more favorable grouping (as noted
above under Group II).
The presence of positive cytology in CSF, pleural or abdominal fluids as well as implants on
pleural or peritoneal surfaces are regarded as indications for placing the patient in Group IV.
SURGICAL GUIDELINES
Data Submission Section (High, pg 71)
All pretreatment staging forms, operative notes, and other surgical check sheets should be
completed by the responsible surgeon and reviewed where applicable by the hospital surgical
representative for accuracy, completeness, and protocol compliance to include final pathologic
verification of residual and/or metastatic disease, and cytological examination of pleural and
peritoneal fluid. The Surgical Committee of the STS Committee will evaluate the pretreatment
stage assigned, the Clinical Group assignment, the anatomic site designation, and the adherence
by the surgeon(s) to these surgical guidelines for quality assurance reporting.
Pretreatment Clinical Staging (Int, pg 87)
This is a modification of the UICC-TNM staging system and is based on site, size, clinical
regional nodal status and distant spread. The staging is CLINICAL and should be done BY
THE RESPONSIBLE SURGEON based on PREOPERATIVE imaging and physical
findings. Intraoperative and/or pathologic results should not affect the stage (but will affect
Clinical Group). For example a regional lymph node that is clinically positive but
pathologically negative is N1. A node that is clinically negative but pathologically positive
places the patient in Clinical Group II B. However, patients with metastatic disease
discovered at surgery would be classified as Stage 4 (Clinical Group IV).
Size should reflect actual physical examination or imaging measurements. Site designation
alters stage and, therefore, treatment assignment. Careful evaluation of clinical and/or
imaging findings should precede multidisciplinary site assignment. THE SURGEON IS
GENERALLY BEST ABLE to designate site when choice is difficult. See Appendices II,
III, IV, and V for Staging/Clinical Grouping Criteria and Site Classification.
Surgical-pathologic (Clinical) Group ( Int, pg 87)
Clinical Group assignment is based on intraoperative findings and post-operative pathologic
status and must include final pathologic verification of margins, residual, node involvement,
and cytological examination of pleural and peritoneal fluid, and CSF, when applicable. See
Appendix III for Clinical Grouping Criteria.
*It is important to note that the Clinical Group designation assigned at the time of
enrollment on study remains unchanged regardless of any second-look operation that
may be performed. Clinical Group can be changed
SURGICAL PRINCIPLES: (High, pg 72)
The basic principle of wide and complete resection of the primary tumor with a surrounding
"envelope" of normal tissue should still be attempted as an initial procedure even in the presence
of metastatic disease. This approach is generally more applicable to sites in the extremities or
trunk than in the head and neck, but adequate margins of uninvolved tissue are still suggested to
achieve local tumor control unless this involves an extensive operative procedure with sacrifice
of normal tissue that would result in loss of function/cosmesis or is not technically feasible.
There are several exceptions to this principle including primary tumors in the orbit,
paramemingeal, or genitourinary system. Adequate margins of normal tissue are preferable to
leaving gross or microscopic tumor in situ. For tumors that are too large to be resected without
causing significant damage to the patient then an initial biopsy of the primary tumor and any
involved lymph nodes should be performed. A subsequent delayed resection can then be
performed following chemotherapy and radiation if the tumor has diminished enough to make
resection of the tumor feasible.
Margins. (High, pg 72)
If resection of the primary site is carried out, the surgeon should mark all margins and orient
the specimen at the operative field, so that margin evaluation is precise. Narrow margins are
unavoidable in some sites such as in the head and neck. In these situations, the surgeon
should take a number of separate biopsies of the “normal” tissue around the margins of
resection and these should be marked and submitted separately for pathologic review.
Communication with the pathologist is mandatory to assure accuracy of margin examination.
The tumor should not be bisected or cut into separate specimens prior to this discussion. Any
suspected microscopic or gross residual tumor that cannot be resected should be marked in
the tumor bed with titanium clips to aid radiotherapy simulation.
Node Sampling or Node Dissection (Int, pg 88)
Clinical and/or imaging evaluation of regional lymph nodes should be performed
pretreatment and preoperatively by the responsible surgeon and is an important part of
pretreatment staging. Identification of the sentinel node by injection of methylene blue dye
and technetium 99m at the site of the primary tumor can assist in identifying the node most
likely to contain tumor deposits. Pathologic confirmation of clinically positive nodes should
be performed. In those patients with clinically/radiographically enlarged nodes, treatment
with chemotherapy and irradiation is recommended. However, it is preferable to avoid the
need for radiotherapy. Therefore the clinically or radiographically enlarged node(s) should be
sampled histologically; patients with no tumor in the node(s) will not require radiation of the
regional nodal bed. Open biopsy is recommended, but needle aspiration may be appropriate,
based on the surgeon’s judgment and pathologist’s recommendations. Pathologic evaluation
of clinically uninvolved nodes is site specific; it is required in extremity sites and in boys
10 years with paratesticular primaries. Aggressive regional lymph node sampling is the most
appropriate method of surgical evaluation for most sites. Prophylactic radical node
dissection, as employed for some other malignancies, is not necessary in childhood RMS.
However, staging ipsilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (SIRPLND) (see
description Appendix VI) is required for all boys 10 years of age and older with
paratesticular RMS and for patients < 10 yrs. with positive nodes on CT exam.
Pretreatment Re-excision (PRE) (Int, pg 88)
The initial surgical procedure (a biopsy or excision as employed for benign tumor) may have
been performed prior to establishing the diagnosis and/or the involvement of the oncology
team and may result in a situation in which there is: 1) gross residual tumor, 2)
microscopically involved margins, or 3) uncertainty as to margins or residual. This applies
even if the microscopic margin is thought to be clear, if the operation and pathologic study
were not done as described in 14.4.1.
Under these circumstances the concept of Pretreatment Re-excision (PRE) is advisable and
should be applied wherever feasible, unless the resulting disability is considered
unacceptable, i.e., resulting in loss of function or an unacceptable cosmetic result. This
means wide re-excision of the previous operative site, including an adequate "envelope" of
normal tissue, with careful marking and examination of all margins. This approach is
particularly applicable to extremity and trunk lesions although it should be applied wherever
possible. This procedure must be done prior to administration of chemotherapy or radiation.
Clinical Group assignment will be determined on the basis of pathology from the definitive
operation prior to the start of multimodal therapy. The prior procedure(s) will be considered
as an excisional biopsy. The conclusion that such re-operation is not advisable or feasible
must be reached by multidisciplinary discussion and the reasons are to be listed on the
surgical check sheet.
Second Look Operation(SLO) or Delayed Primary Resection (Int, pg 88)
Residual persistent mass after local radiotherapy is common, and in previous analyses is not
correlated with patient outcome. Second look surgery is not recommended after irradiation,
particularly before Week 15. Should the local treating institution elect to perform a second
look surgery, justification for this decision must be discussed with the one of the ARST0531
surgical representatives. Such patients may remain on study if approved in writing by the
ARST0531 surgical representative
CENTRAL LINE (Low, pg 44)
Central venous access (generally a venous port) is recommended for all patients
IPSILATERAL STAGING RETROPERITONEAL NODE DISSECTION:
RECOMMENDED TECHNIQUE: (LOW RISK, APPENDIX VII, PG 93)
Open Ipsilateral Node Dissection
A nerve sparing ipsilateral template modification to the standard bilateral RPLND is
recommended. This is based on techniques described and modified by Narayan, Donohue,
Jeweett and Ritchie. The approach can be transperitoneal or lateral extraperitoneal (i.e. used
in renal transplant or spine fusion exposure) or laparoscopic. Figures 1 and 2 adapted from
Ritchie are the templates for the dissection. In either right or left sided lesions the dissection
boundaries above the inferior mesenteric artery are similar, but contralateral dissection below
the IMA is avoided to assure preservation of the sympathetic fibers at L2 - 4 which are the
most important fibers for ejaculatory function. Before beginning the dissection, the
postganglionic nerve fibers overlying the aorta should be identified. It should be pointed out
that the right-sided fibers arise behind the vena cava and pass anteriorly between the cava
and aorta. The sympathetic chains are then identified just above the common iliac arteries. As
each branch is exposed it is freed and tagged with a vessel loop. The loop can be used to
manipulate the fibers atraumatically as the lymphatics are dissected from behind them. The
lumber arteries and veins are either preserved or carefully dissected so as to preserve the
closely adherent nerve fibers.
Right Sided Lesions
The dissection for right sided lesions begins at the level of both renal veins encompassing the
aorta and cava and intra-aortocaval tissue across to the left gonadal vein / ureteral junction
down to the inferior mesenteric artery and then down the right side to the level of the right
common iliac artery where it is crossed by the ureter. The ipsilateral spermatic vessels are
removed to the deep inguinal ring where the previously ligated stump of the cord is removed.
Left Sided Lesions
A similar dissection for left sided lesions is carried out with the exception of the right lateral
margin, which is the vena cava rather than the right ureter. (This is due to a different pattern
of nodal spread) The infra -IMA dissection is the mirr or image of that described for right -
sided lesions. The ipsilateral spermatic vessels are removed to the deep inguinal ring where
the previously ligated stump of the cord is removed.
*The specimen should be marked so that the highest node(s) is identified,
Laparoscopic Node Dissection
Ipsilateral retroperitoneal node dissection can be carried out effectively using laparoscopic
techniques by experienced surgeons. If, in the opinion of the surgeon, surgical goals will be
compromised by the laparoscopic approach for any reason after the start of a procedure, then
conversion to an open node dissection is mandatory.
Preoperative colon cleansing is helpful and the bladder should be decompressed. The patient
should be positioned in lateral decubitus position, facing the surgeon, with his abdomen near
the edge of the table the primary tumor. The side ipsilateral to the tumor should be toward the
ceiling. It is important to be able to tilt the table to a Trendelenburg position to gain access to
the pelvis.
The initial cannula (for the telescope) can be inserted in the umbilicus, but may be better
placed lateral to the rectus muscle at the level of the umbilicus, particularly in obese or
muscular boys. Two additional working ports should be placed, one superior and the other
inferior to the cannula, lateral to the rectus muscle.
An incision should be made in the peritoneum lateral to the colon to reflect the colon
sufficiently medially to expose the aorta and the vena cava, and sufficiently superiorly to
display the renal vessels. Care should be taken so as not to reflect the ureter with the colon.
The dissection can begin either at the inguinal ring or the renal vessels .The same template
described for the open technique should be followed. Nerve preservation should also be
similar. Hemostasis can be secured using any energy device with which the surgeon is
comfortable (e.g.: hook cautery, harmonic scalpel, Ligasure
, etc.) or using endoscopic
clips. The specimen should be marked for location identification and remo ved using a
laparascopic retrieval bag so as not to drag potentially involved tissue directly through the
trocar sites.
Figure 1: Right sided template: the dissection begins at the level of both renal veins
encompassing the aorta and cava and intra-aortocaval tissue across to the left gonadal vein /
ureteral junction down to the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and then down the right side to
the level of the right common iliac artery where it is crossed by the ureter. The ipsilateral
spermatic vessels are removed to the deep inguinal ring where the previously ligated stump
(LS) of the cord is removed. Figure 2: Left sided template: a similar dissection is carried out
with the exception of the right lateral margin, which is the vena cava rather than the right
ureter. The infra-IMA dissection is the mirror image of that described for right-sided lesions.
The ipsilateral spermatic vessels are removed to the deep inguinal ring where the previously
ligated stump (LS) of the cord is removed.
PATHOLOGY
D9902, BIOLOGY PROTOCOL:
PROCEDURE FOR PROCUREMENT, PREPARATION AND SHIPMENT OF
MATERIALS
Diagnostic material may be obtained via incisional biopsy or multiple core needle (tru-cut or
like) biopsies. Fine needle aspiration biopsy is not acceptable to establish the diagnosis. Core
needle biopsies are prone to sampling error, which may make histologic subclassification
difficult and may result in an underestimate of the tumor grade. Thus, sufficient tissue must be
obtained. Incisional biopsy is the preferred approach at all anatomic sites, particularly in the
extremities, chest wall, and abdominal wall. Within the thoracic and pelvic cavities, and in the
head and neck, multiple core needle biopsies are acceptable. The minimum recommended
sampling is 8 core biopsies of 2 cm in length. The surgeon should sample each of the 4
quadrants of the tumor. Care should be taken to prevent penetration of the needle through the
tumor into unaffected soft tissues.
Procurement
Specimens can be submitted at multiple time points without re-enrollment on D9902.
Surgical Tissue
Whenever possible, tumor specimens should be obtained fresh from the operating room to allow
optimal specimen triage, which includes (in order of importance):
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue for histology and immunohistochemistry
Tissue for biology studies and banking
Upon removal, the tumor specimen should be submitted immediately to the pathologist. It
should not be bisected or cut into pieces prior to pathologic evaluation. The tissue should not be
placed in formalin, as fresh and snap frozen tissue may be helpful in establishing the diagnosis
and providing materials for biology studies and banking. Frozen section may be helpful in some
cases to confirm that diagnostic tissue has been obtained.
It is not generally recommended that excision be attempted on initial biopsy material, but if
the lesion is small and in an optimal location, this decision may be made at the time of
operation. In these cases, the lesion should be carefully inked to avoid contamination of the
submitted biology materials. Conversely, material for biologic studies should be carefully
obtained so as not to contaminate the surgical margin. The evaluation of margins determines
surgical stage and subsequent therapy.
After the necessary tissues for diagnosis and local institutional research are met, the
remaining tissue may be submitted to the BPC.
It may be desirable to discuss with operating room and pathology personnel why tissue is
being procured and the necessity for prompt and accurate processing, labeling and handling.
Tumor specimens obtained prior to treatment should be submitted. Submission of viable
post-therapeutic tumor tissue is encouraged and may be a requirement of the therapeutic
study on which the patient is enrolled.
Operating Room personnel should not put the tissue into fixative. The specimen should be
brought to the Pathology Department quickly, by special messenger if necessary.
Tissues for submission to the BPC should be as sterile as possible.
Preparation
For Central Pathology Review
Promptly following removal, tumor tissue and slides for central pathology review should be
prepared as described below. All supplies are provided by the Biopathology Center.
Representative formalin-fixed paraffin blocks of tumor material: If blocks absolutely cannot
be sent, then send 1 H&E section from each available blocks and 10 (RMS) or 20 (NRSTS)
plus-charged (polarized) unstained slides for immunoperoxidase studies from 1-2
representative blocks and 1-2 H&E slides from the same blocks. Be sure to include the
Pathology Report, the Pathology Checklist, Operative Report and the COG Specimen
Transmittal form with the samples. Label all materials with the patient’s COG patient ID
number and the surgical pathology identification (SPID) number.
This material can be sent along with the biology specimens or under separate cover.
Specimens for Biology Studies
Label all biology specimens with the patient’s BPC number, specimen type and collection
date.
Tissue Frozen in OCT (1st priority)
Two truncated molds are provided for tumor (primary tumor and metastatic, if available).
Use a CryoMarker or Securline Superfrost Marker to label the mold with the BPC specimen
number. Cover the bottom of the mold with OCT embedding medium. Using forceps, place
the mold over (not in) liquid nitrogen until the OCT appears to lose its transparency. Place
up to 1 gm of tissue in this thickened gel, pushing the specimen to the bottom of the mold.
Add additional OCT to completely cover the tumor and fill until approximately three-fourths
full. Gradually immerse the entire mold into liquid nitrogen until completely solid. Store the
mold with the snap frozen specimens at -80
C until shipment.
Snap-Frozen Tissue (2nd Priority)
At least one specimen from the primary (if present) and metastatic areas (if present) should
be cut into 2-3 mm slices (send as much tissue as available in 1cc aliquots) wrapped in foil
and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen or cold isopentane. Mark foils as “primary” or
“metastatic” if both are being submitted.
Some normal tissue should be submitted in addition to the tumor tissue, if available. This
can be any normal tissue, e.g., muscle, skin, etc. Send as much normal tissue as possible but
not to exceed the amount of tumor tissue provided. Wrap normal tissue in foil, snap freeze,
and mark “normal”. Store snap frozen tissue at -80
C until shipment.
Formalin-Fixed Tissue/Needle Cores
Tissue sections (a “cassette sized” piece), adjacent to both the submitted tumor and to the
submitted normal specimens, should be sent. The tissue sections should be placed in the
labeled formalin jars (“T” for tumor and “N” for normal). Stretch the Parafilm around the
caps. If formalin fixed tissue is not available then, for tissue microarrays, a representative
paraffin block of tumor from the pathology workup can be sent to the BPC. The BPC can
core the blocks for the institutions and return them (upon request). As an alternative, the BPC
can provide a coring kit to the institution so that the institution can core their own blocks and
send two to three 1 mm core biopsies of the block to BPC.
Bone Marrow and Blood
Specimens should be submitted to the BPC whenever bone marrow aspirates are collected.
Three to six mL of the bone marrow aspirate and five to ten mL of whole blood
anticoagulated with EDTA (purple top tubes) should be collected and kept at room
temperature.
Serum
Prior to therapy, collect 4-6 mL of blood in a red top tube (2 mL for children 5 years of age
or less). Spin blood for 10 minutes at 2500 rpm at 4ºC. Transfer serum into tubes provided
in the specimen procurement kit. Using a waterproof marker, label the tubes with the
patient’s BPC number and the date obtained. Store serum at -80ºC until shipment.
Banking
If consent for banking is signed, all specimens leftover from central review and biology
studies will be banked for future research.
Shipment
BPC Number
Patients will receive a BPC number when they are registered with the COG Cancer Registry.
This anonymous number will be used to label the specimens and all paperwork sent to the
BPC. Please label the fresh tissue sent to Dr. Bridge with the patient’s COG Patient ID
number.
Specimen Transmittal Form
A Specimen Transmittal Form (one copy) must accompany each shipment of specimens.
The form is available on the COG website.
Mailing Kits
Mailing kits are provided by the BPC upon request. The kits include foil for frozen tissue,
plastic zip lock baggies, truncated embedding molds for tumor frozen in OCT and formalin
containers for fixed tissue. Also included with each kit are instructions, mailing labels, and a
Federal Express air bill.
Packing
The snap frozen tissue, OCT block, and sera must be sent on dry ice. Using approximately 4
lbs. total, layer ½ the dry ice on the bottom of the compartment, add the specimens, then fill
with the remaining dry ice and replace the Styrofoam top.
Place the formalin containers, bone marrow, and blood samples with the Specimen
Transmittal Form in the second (room temperature) compartment.
Seal the kit securely with filament or other durable sealing tape. Complete the pre-printed
Federal Express air bill, insert it into the plastic pouch and attach the pouch to the top of the
kit. Complete the dry ice label (UN 1845) and stick both this label and the UN3373 label to
the side of the box. Be sure to mark only on the lines provided and send the kit to:
Biopathology Center
Columbus Children’s Hospital
700 Children’s Drive, Rm. WA1340
Columbus, Ohio 43205
(614) 722-2810
Shipping
Arrange for Federal Express pick-up per your usual institutional procedure or by calling 1-
800-238-5355. When requesting pick-up, be sure to give the account number but stress that
pick-up is at your institutional address.
Specimens should be shipped Monday through Thursday for delivery Tuesday through
Friday. If the specimen is collected on Friday, please store frozen tissue in a -80
C freezer.
Refrigerate blood and bone marrow, at 4
C for shipping on Monday. Fresh tissue can be
shipped any day of the week, and should be sent without delay.
ADDITIONAL PATHOLOGY GUIDELINES AND SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS
FROM CLINICAL PROTOCOLS (LOW, PG 61)
.
Patients who do not enroll on D9902 prior to starting therapy are not eligible for this
protocol.
2/2/07
If there is clinical urgency to start therapy, treatment assignment will occur at study entry
based on institutional pathology prior to completion of Rapid Central Review. The diagnosis
will be confirmed/corrected within 14 days after D9902 study enrollment. If patient therapy
needs to be changed because of a change of the histologic diagnosis based on rapid central
review, the patient should be switched to an appropriate treatment regimen before Week 4
therapy is started.
The STS Pathology Center will notify the institution with the rapid review results via fax or
overnight mail with a copy of the report being submitted to the STS Data Management
Center for tracking.
If Pathology Center and institutional diagnosis agree, treatment should continue based on the
institutional histologic subtype.
-FOR LOW RISK PATIENTS:
If the results of the rapid review make a patient previously enrolled on another STS
protocol eligible for ARST0331, the patient must be switched, enrolled on, and begin
therapy according to ARST0331 by Week 4. Consent for ARST0331 Therapy must be
signed prior to start of therapy.
-FOR INTERMEDIATE RISK PATIENTS:
If the results of the rapid review make a patient previously enrolled on another STS
protocol eligible for ARST0531, the patient must be switched, enrolled on, and begin
therapy according to ARST0531 by Week 4. Consent for ARST0531 Therapy must be
signed prior to start of therapy.
15.2.2 Pathology Review at Time of Second Look Surgery
A second pathology review will be required at the time of second look surgery. This is not a
rapid review, so materials do not need to be submitted overnight. Results of pathology
review of second look surgeries are not reviewed rapidly and results are not returned to the
referring institution.
Materials to send:
Send at the time of Second
Look surgery:
Representative formalin-fixed
paraffin blocks of tumor
material (If patient did not
consent to banking on D9902
then paraffin blocks will be
returned after sectioning). If
blocks absolutely cannot be
sent, then send 1 H&E section
Label all materials with the patient’s COG patient
identification number and the surgical pathology
identification (SPID) number from the corresponding
pathology report.
Please call the STS Pathology Center at 614-722-2898 to notify
them of the shipment.
03/08/07
of all available blocks and
10 plus-charged (polarized)
unstained sections for
immunoperoxidase studies from
1-2 representative blocks and 1-
2 H&E slides from the same
blocks.
Documentation including:
Institutional Pathology Report *
Pathology Checklist
Institutional Operative Report
COG Specimen Transmittal
form
Label the parcel "STS Second Look Review".
Please use the phone number listed below, which is for the
central receiving area, on all packages shipped to the STS
Pathology Center.
Send all pathology central rapid review materials to:
COG Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Columbus Children's Hospital
700 Children’s Drive WA1340
Columbus, OH 43205
Phone: (614) 722-2810
FAX: (614) 722-2897
*a preliminary report may be sent with the review material, but please fax the final report
when available
The Study review pathologists are:
Review Pathologist:
Stephen Qualman, M.D.
Children’s Research Institute
700 Children's Drive WA5011
Columbus, OH 43205
Phone (614) 722-5302
Qualmans@pediatrics.ohio-
state.edu
Review Pathologist:
David Parham, M.D.
Department of Pathology
Arkansas Children's Hospital
800 Marshall Street, Slot 820
Little Rock, AR 72202-3591
parhamdavidm@uams.edu
Do not send specimens directly to the review pathologists. All specimens must be sent to the
Biopathology Center (BPC).
03/08/07
TREATMENT
LOW RISK, 0331
Once enrolled and assigned to Regimen A (Subset 1) or B (Subset 2), patients will start
therapy with one cycle of VAC. Patients with embryonal or the botryoid or spindle cell
variants of embryonal RMS confirmed by enrollment on D9902 will continue on ARST0331.
Patients whose tumors are alveolar RMS will transfer to the intermediate risk RMS protocol.
Alternatively, patients who start on the intermediate risk protocol and are found to have
embryonal or botryoid/spindle cell RMS may transfer to ARST0331 by Week 4 of treatment
if they can be assigned to Subset 1 or 2.
Patients with recurrent or progressive disease at any site during any evaluation will be taken
off protocol therapy and followed at six-month intervals for survival. These patients may be
eligible for a COG recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma study. Some patients may have a residual
imaging abnormality at the end of therapy. Such patients may be observed without
intervention. Biopsies are often difficult to interpret in this setting and expert pathology
consultation is strongly encouraged should the treating institution elect to perform a biopsy to
assess response to therapy. If a patient undergoes biopsy/surgery during follow-up or at
recurrence, specimens should be sent as specified in D9902.
General Therapy Guidelines
Regimen A (Subset 1) patients will have 22 weeks of therapy and evaluation at weeks 12 and
24.
Regimen B (Subset 2) patients will have 46 weeks of therapy and evaluations at weeks 12,
24, 36 and 48.
Central review of pathology (on D9902) must be accomplished by the start of Week 4
therapy.
Local Control: Radiation therapy begins at Week 13 for most patients (except Clinical
Group I disease or node-negative Clinical Group III uterine/cervix primaries that are
completely resected at Week 13, and patients with node negative vaginal primaries who
begin radiation if necessary, following surgery at Week 24). Week 28 dactinomycin should
be omitted for patients with vaginal primaries who are receiving radiation therapy at that
time.
Patients with Clinical Group III disease may undergo second look surgery at Week 13 (based
on Week 12 evaluation) followed by response-adjusted radiation therapy dosing. Radiation
therapy should begin and chemotherapy should resume as soon as possible following
surgery.
INTERMEDIATE RISK, 0531
Both regimen A and B patients will have 42 weeks of therapy.
Confirmation of pathology must be accomplished by the start of Week 3 therapy.
Local control will be provided according to the local control pathways (See Appendix VII).
Radiation therapy begins at Week 4 for all patients (with the exceptions of alveolar RMS
rendered Group I by amputation, Week 1 emergency radiotherapy for symptomatic spinal
cord compression, or individualized local control for children ≤ 24 months as outlined
below).
Special Note for Patients ≤ 24 Months Old:
The long-term morbidity of radiotherapy or aggressive surgery for very young (≤ 24 months
old) children makes appropriate local control challenging. Many clinicians are unwilling to
follow standardized local control guidelines for very young children. This study encourages
adherence to standardized local control guidelines for children ≤ 24 months old but permits
deviations at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Deviation from protocol-mandated
radiotherapy must be included in the QA documentation submitted to QARC. For patients <
24 months only, deviations from the standardized local control guidelines will not be
considered protocol violations.
Second Look Operations (SLO) or Delayed Primary Resections (DPR):
Residual persistent mass after local radiotherapy is common, and in previous analyses is not
correlated with patient outcome. Second look surgery is not recommended after irradiation,
particularly before Week 15. Should the local treating institution elect to perform a second
look surgery, patients will remain on study.
HIGH RISK, 0431
Patients whose tumor histology on Central Review is found not to be RMS will
be removed from study.
Patients with recurrent or progressive disease at any site during any evaluation
will be taken off protocol therapy but remain on study, and followed at six -
month intervals for survival. These patients should be treated aggressively using
active agents and may be eligible for a COG recurrent RMS study.
Some patients may have residual imaging abnormality at the end of therapy.
Such patients should be observed without intervent ion. Biopsies are often
difficult to interpret in this setting and expert pathology consultation is strongly
encouraged should the treating institution elect to perform a biopsy.
General Therapy Guidelines
Patients with parameningeal (without intracranial extension) and paraspinal tumors should
receive chemotherapy beginning Week 1 and begin radiotherapy at Week 20
Patients requiring emergency radiation therapy (for intracranial extension or spinal cord
impingement) should begin chemotherapy Week 1 (irino tecan/vincristine) concurrently with
radiation therapy.
SURGEON RESPONSIBILITIES
FOR PROTOCOLS ARST 0331, 0531, AND 0431, SURGERY CONTACTS
INCLUDE:
Low Risk, 0331: Charles Paidas cpaidas@health.usf.edu
Richard Andrassy Richard.andrassy@uth.tmc.edu
Intermediate Risk, 0531 David Rodeberg rodeberg.david@chp.edu
Kenneth Brown kbrown@interchange.ubc.ca
Andrea Hayes-Jordan andrea.hayes-
jordan@uth.tmc.edu
Charles Paidas cpaidas@health.usf.edu
High Risk, 0431 David Rodeberg rodeberg.david@chp.edu
As stated in the Data Submission section, All pretreatment staging forms, operative notes,
and other surgical check sheets should be completed by the responsible surgeon and
reviewed where applicable by the hospital surgical representative for accuracy, completeness,
and protocol
Compliance. These materials should then be forwarded to the Data Management Center in a
timely fashion through the institution’s RDE system. . The Data Management Center will
collate the data for the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the COG, which will evaluate the
pretreatment stage assigned, the Clinical Group assignment, the anatomic site designation,
and the adherence by the surgeon(s) to these surgical guidelines for quality assurance
reporting.
Staging is CLINICAL and should be done BY THE RESPONSIBLE
SURGEON based on PREOPERATIVE imaging and physical findings.
Intraoperative and/or pathologic results should not affect the stage, but will affect
Clinical Group.
Site designation alters stage and, therefore, treatment assignment. Careful
evaluation of clinical and/or imaging findings should precede multidisciplinary site
assignment. THE SURGEON IS GENERALLY BEST ABLE to designate site
when choice is difficult.
SURGICAL CHECKLIST
(link to https://members.childrensoncologygroup.org/_files/irsg_forms/srgcheck.pdf)
03/08/07
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. COG Rhabdomyosarcoma Handbook. . GlobalCastMD Medical Library. https://library.globalcastmd.com/guideline/4234
Comments