Lourina Flakari

25 statements · 1 topic · summaries given as host listed separately

Featured statements

▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
But we don't want the spine to fuse. So going anteriorly, you can place these tether devices without actually fusing the spine.
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
If you do it in a mature patient, it's probably not going to work.

Nothing matches these filters — clear the search or widen the filters.

Lourina's statements about Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis 25 statements

Open the Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis collection →

2025 Pediatric Surgery Update Course - Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) for Scoliosis

▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
clinical The tether is placed on the convex side of the spine anteriorly to partially correct the curve and modulate growth ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
clinical The procedure requires a skeletally immature patient so that as they grow, they grow straighter ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
clinical If VBT is performed in a mature patient, it is probably not going to work ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
guideline Current indications for VBT are immature, moderately severe curves that are flexible ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
quote So should we even back it up a little and who in the audience has even heard of this? Like are we doing tethering at all of the hospitals? Maybe 50-50? ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
quote If you do it in a mature patient, it's probably not going to work. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
quote But we don't want the spine to fuse. So going anteriorly, you can place these tether devices without actually fusing the spine. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
clinical Hybrid techniques can be used where if the thoracic curve doesn't meet criteria, only the lumbar spine is tethered since motion is needed there ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
clinical For double tethering, the patient must be positioned in lateral decubitus with convex side up, then flipped to do the lumbar side ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
quote So at Akron Children's, we have not been a super early adopter. So some of you might have even more experience than we do. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:26
opinion VBT is less invasive and more physiologic than spinal fusion, with hoped-for improved long-term outcomes due to preserved disc mobility ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:46
clinical Patients are mobilized immediately postoperatively and returned to sports within six weeks, compared to three to six months for fusion ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:46
clinical Segmental vessels are typically ligated on one side during VBT, which is considered safe with neuromonitoring, though taking vessels on both sides risks spinal infarct ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:46
clinical T12-L1 levels can usually be reached through the thoracoscopic approach by bluntly dissecting along the diaphragm ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:46
clinical L1-L4 levels are accessed through an open incision ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:46
clinical Screws are placed under fluoroscopic guidance at each level, attempting to go straight across the vertebrae ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:46
clinical EMG neuromonitoring is used during the procedure ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:46
clinical The tether is threaded through each screw and a tensioning gun is used to place tension, mostly centered around the apex, to achieve correction ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
clinical The sweet spot for VBT timing is when growth can be modulated to change the shape of the disc space and vertebrae as the patient grows ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
clinical If VBT is done too soon, patients can over-correct; if done too late, nothing happens and the tether will eventually break, reverting to the previous shape ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
clinical People doing VBT in adults have not had very good outcomes ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
opinion VBT has exploded in popularity in recent years as data shows outcomes are improving over time ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
clinical VBT started being performed in the mid-2000s at certain centers ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
quote Yeah, so those are some great points and there are people out there doing this in adults and their outcomes are not very good. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
quote So I think that we're starting to do a better job now that we have this FDA investigational device exemption that we can study this better prospectively. ↗

Summaries Lourina gave as host · 5 summaries

Recaps of other experts' statements, not Lourina's own clinical position.

Summaries Lourina gave as host · Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis 5 summaries

Open the Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis collection →

2025 Pediatric Surgery Update Course - Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) for Scoliosis

▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
host summary Lourina Flakari summarizing the discussion: The first prospective VBT study from Mayo Clinic found 75% success rate at two years based on curve size and lack of revisions, down to 63% at 3.8 years with a 20% revision rate ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
host summary Lourina Flakari summarizing the discussion: Most VBT complications occurred early on when centers didn't know how to select the right patient, and success improves with experience ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
host summary Lourina Flakari summarizing the discussion: One study showed no difference in complications between chest tubes and bulb suction drains for VBT ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
host summary Lourina Flakari summarizing the discussion: Another study looked at postoperative tranexamic acid to reduce drainage and retention time ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:57
host summary Lourina Flakari summarizing the discussion: A study suggested that multidisciplinary collaborative approach can improve VBT outcomes ↗