Elizabeth Speck

69 statements · 5 topics

Congenital Lung Lesions (CPAM) · guest expert

Featured statements

▶ Ep 7 · 6:53
Don't just do a stable lobectomy. The data does support that, to do some pleural-based management. But, you know, how much of the pleuris should you take out? Is it 25%? Is it just the apex? Is it 50%? Do you really need to strip the entire chest wall? Who knows?
▶ Ep 4 · 6:22
This one is really clear. Don't do cross-sectional imaging on children to help you make clinical decision about these patients. The data are supportive that conclusion.
▶ Ep 4 · 6:42
If they're reaccumulate air, well then, you have your answer. They have an ongoing air link and that patient warrants an operation.
▶ Ep 31 · 6:22
Cross-sectional imaging should not be performed on children with spontaneous pneumothorax to help make clinical decisions; the data support this conclusion
▶ Ep 7 · 6:22
Cross-sectional imaging should not be done on children to help make clinical decisions about spontaneous pneumothorax
▶ Ep 31 · 6:51
The data support doing some pleural-based management rather than just staple lobectomy alone for spontaneous pneumothorax

Nothing matches these filters — clear the search or widen the filters.

Elizabeth's statements about Anastomotic Strictures 12 statements

Open the Anastomotic Strictures collection →

Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: October 2023

▶ Ep 4 · 5:39
quote The first question should be, do we need to do anything at all? But it's not just the 1 centimeter pneumothorax that most pediatric surgeons wouldn't. Put a tube in, right? What about the big pneumothoraces? And I would tell you that large prospective study demonstrated that you can safely observe even children with even a sizable pneumothorax. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 5:43
clinical A large prospective study demonstrated that even children with sizable pneumothorax can be safely observed ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 6:22
quote This one is really clear. Don't do cross-sectional imaging on children to help you make clinical decision about these patients. The data are supportive that conclusion. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 6:22
guideline Cross-sectional imaging should not be performed on children with spontaneous pneumothorax to help make clinical decisions; the data support this conclusion ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 6:42
quote If they're reaccumulate air, well then, you have your answer. They have an ongoing air link and that patient warrants an operation. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 6:42
clinical If patients reaccumulate air after initial management, they have an ongoing air leak and warrant an operation ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 6:51
quote Now, that's tricky. Don't just do a stable lobectomy. The data does support that, to do some pleural-based management. But, you know, how much of the pleuris should you take out? Is it 25%? Is it just the apex? Is it 50%? Do you really need to strip the entire chest wall? Who knows? ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 6:51
clinical The data support doing some pleural-based management rather than just staple lobectomy alone for spontaneous pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:28
epidemiological Studies are not available to demonstrate that one pleural-based procedure is better than another ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:28
quote Studies just aren't there to really demonstrate one pleural based procedure is better than. Another ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:52
quote This, I would say, has the least data in the literature to support really any conclusive suggestion. The gist is, and the way we worded it in the manuscript is whatever you did before, do something more. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:52
opinion For recurrent pneumothorax, whatever procedure was done before, do something more aggressive ↗
Elizabeth's statements about Congenital Lung Lesions (CPAM) 24 statements

Open the Congenital Lung Lesions (CPAM) collection →

Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: October 2023

▶ Ep 31 · 5:39
quote The first question should be, do we need to do anything at all? But it's not just the 1 centimeter pneumothorax that most pediatric surgeons wouldn't. Put a tube in, right? What about the big pneumothoraces? And I would tell you that large prospective study demonstrated that you can safely observe even children with even a sizable pneumothorax. ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 5:39
quote The first question should be, do we need to do anything at all? But it's not just the 1 centimeter pneumothorax that most pediatric surgeons wouldn't. Put a tube in, right? What about the big pneumothoraces? And I would tell you that large prospective study demonstrated that you can safely observe even children with even a sizable pneumothorax. ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 5:43
clinical A large prospective study demonstrated that even children with sizable pneumothorax can be safely observed ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 5:43
clinical A large prospective study demonstrated that even children with sizable pneumothorax can be safely observed ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:22
guideline Cross-sectional imaging should not be performed on children with spontaneous pneumothorax to help make clinical decisions; the data support this conclusion ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:22
quote This one is really clear. Don't do cross-sectional imaging on children to help you make clinical decision about these patients. The data are supportive that conclusion. ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:22
guideline Cross-sectional imaging should not be performed on children with spontaneous pneumothorax to help make clinical decisions; the data support this conclusion ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:22
quote This one is really clear. Don't do cross-sectional imaging on children to help you make clinical decision about these patients. The data are supportive that conclusion. ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:42
quote If they're reaccumulate air, well then, you have your answer. They have an ongoing air link and that patient warrants an operation. ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:42
clinical If patients reaccumulate air after initial management, they have an ongoing air leak and warrant an operation ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:42
quote If they're reaccumulate air, well then, you have your answer. They have an ongoing air link and that patient warrants an operation. ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:42
clinical If patients reaccumulate air after initial management, they have an ongoing air leak and warrant an operation ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:51
clinical The data support doing some pleural-based management rather than just staple lobectomy alone for spontaneous pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:51
quote Now, that's tricky. Don't just do a stable lobectomy. The data does support that, to do some pleural-based management. But, you know, how much of the pleuris should you take out? Is it 25%? Is it just the apex? Is it 50%? Do you really need to strip the entire chest wall? Who knows? ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:51
quote Now, that's tricky. Don't just do a stable lobectomy. The data does support that, to do some pleural-based management. But, you know, how much of the pleuris should you take out? Is it 25%? Is it just the apex? Is it 50%? Do you really need to strip the entire chest wall? Who knows? ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 6:51
clinical The data support doing some pleural-based management rather than just staple lobectomy alone for spontaneous pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:28
epidemiological Studies are not available to demonstrate that one pleural-based procedure is better than another ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:28
quote Studies just aren't there to really demonstrate one pleural based procedure is better than. Another ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:28
quote Studies just aren't there to really demonstrate one pleural based procedure is better than. Another ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:28
epidemiological Studies are not available to demonstrate that one pleural-based procedure is better than another ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:52
opinion For recurrent pneumothorax, whatever procedure was done before, do something more aggressive ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:52
quote This, I would say, has the least data in the literature to support really any conclusive suggestion. The gist is, and the way we worded it in the manuscript is whatever you did before, do something more. ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:52
opinion For recurrent pneumothorax, whatever procedure was done before, do something more aggressive ↗
▶ Ep 31 · 7:52
quote This, I would say, has the least data in the literature to support really any conclusive suggestion. The gist is, and the way we worded it in the manuscript is whatever you did before, do something more. ↗
Elizabeth's statements about Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation 9 statements

Open the Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation collection →

Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: October 2023

▶ Ep 7 · 5:39
quote The first question should be, do we need to do anything at all? But it's not just the 1 centimeter pneumothorax that most pediatric surgeons wouldn't. Put a tube in, right? What about the big pneumothoraces? And I would tell you that large prospective study demonstrated that you can safely observe even children with even a sizable pneumothorax. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 5:43
clinical A large prospective study demonstrated that even children with sizable pneumothorax can be safely observed ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 6:22
guideline Cross-sectional imaging should not be done on children to help make clinical decisions about spontaneous pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 6:22
quote This one is really clear. Don't do cross-sectional imaging on children to help you make clinical decision about these patients. The data are supportive that conclusion. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 6:42
clinical If air reaccumulates after observation, the patient has an ongoing air leak and warrants an operation ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 6:51
clinical Data support doing some pleural-based management rather than just staple lobectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 6:53
quote Don't just do a stable lobectomy. The data does support that, to do some pleural-based management. But, you know, how much of the pleuris should you take out? Is it 25%? Is it just the apex? Is it 50%? Do you really need to strip the entire chest wall? Who knows? ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 7:28
epidemiological Studies are not available to demonstrate one pleural-based procedure is better than another ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 7:52
guideline For recurrent pneumothorax, whatever was done before, do something more ↗
Elizabeth's statements about Esophageal Atresia 12 statements

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: October 2023

▶ Ep 30 · 5:39
quote The first question should be, do we need to do anything at all? But it's not just the 1 centimeter pneumothorax that most pediatric surgeons wouldn't. Put a tube in, right? What about the big pneumothoraces? And I would tell you that large prospective study demonstrated that you can safely observe even children with even a sizable pneumothorax. ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 5:43
clinical A large prospective study demonstrated that even children with sizable pneumothorax can be safely observed ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 6:22
guideline Cross-sectional imaging should not be performed on children with spontaneous pneumothorax to help make clinical decisions; the data support this conclusion ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 6:22
quote This one is really clear. Don't do cross-sectional imaging on children to help you make clinical decision about these patients. The data are supportive that conclusion. ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 6:42
clinical If patients reaccumulate air after initial management, they have an ongoing air leak and warrant an operation ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 6:42
quote If they're reaccumulate air, well then, you have your answer. They have an ongoing air link and that patient warrants an operation. ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 6:51
clinical The data support doing some pleural-based management rather than just staple lobectomy alone for spontaneous pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 6:51
quote Now, that's tricky. Don't just do a stable lobectomy. The data does support that, to do some pleural-based management. But, you know, how much of the pleuris should you take out? Is it 25%? Is it just the apex? Is it 50%? Do you really need to strip the entire chest wall? Who knows? ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 7:28
epidemiological Studies are not available to demonstrate that one pleural-based procedure is better than another ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 7:28
quote Studies just aren't there to really demonstrate one pleural based procedure is better than. Another ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 7:52
opinion For recurrent pneumothorax, whatever procedure was done before, do something more aggressive ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 7:52
quote This, I would say, has the least data in the literature to support really any conclusive suggestion. The gist is, and the way we worded it in the manuscript is whatever you did before, do something more. ↗
Elizabeth's statements about Esophageal Atresia 12 statements

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: October 2023

▶ Ep 57 · 5:39
quote The first question should be, do we need to do anything at all? But it's not just the 1 centimeter pneumothorax that most pediatric surgeons wouldn't. Put a tube in, right? What about the big pneumothoraces? And I would tell you that large prospective study demonstrated that you can safely observe even children with even a sizable pneumothorax. ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 5:43
clinical A large prospective study demonstrated that even children with sizable pneumothorax can be safely observed ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 6:22
quote This one is really clear. Don't do cross-sectional imaging on children to help you make clinical decision about these patients. The data are supportive that conclusion. ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 6:22
guideline Cross-sectional imaging should not be performed on children with spontaneous pneumothorax to help make clinical decisions; the data support this conclusion ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 6:42
clinical If patients reaccumulate air after initial management, they have an ongoing air leak and warrant an operation ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 6:42
quote If they're reaccumulate air, well then, you have your answer. They have an ongoing air link and that patient warrants an operation. ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 6:51
quote Now, that's tricky. Don't just do a stable lobectomy. The data does support that, to do some pleural-based management. But, you know, how much of the pleuris should you take out? Is it 25%? Is it just the apex? Is it 50%? Do you really need to strip the entire chest wall? Who knows? ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 6:51
clinical The data support doing some pleural-based management rather than just staple lobectomy alone for spontaneous pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 7:28
quote Studies just aren't there to really demonstrate one pleural based procedure is better than. Another ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 7:28
epidemiological Studies are not available to demonstrate that one pleural-based procedure is better than another ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 7:52
opinion For recurrent pneumothorax, whatever procedure was done before, do something more aggressive ↗
▶ Ep 57 · 7:52
quote This, I would say, has the least data in the literature to support really any conclusive suggestion. The gist is, and the way we worded it in the manuscript is whatever you did before, do something more. ↗