Virtual curriculum delivery in the COVID-19 era: the pediatric surgery boot camp v2.0
link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on link.springer.com ↗Article · Jul 2022 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This study evaluates a virtual Pediatric Surgery Bootcamp that replaced traditional in-person training during COVID-19, reaching 42 learners across 31 programs at 54% of anticipated costs. While the virtual format demonstrated significant knowledge improvement (48.6% to 66.9% test scores), broader geographic reach, and scheduling flexibility, both learners and program directors still preferred in-person education despite the virtual model's practical advantages.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Purpose
We evaluated the impact of a virtual Pediatric Surgery Bootcamp curriculum on resource utilization, learner engagement, knowledge retention, and stakeholder satisfaction.
Methods
A virtual curriculum was developed around Pediatric Surgery Milestones. GlobalCastMD delivered pre-recorded and live content over a single 10-h day with a concluding social hour. Metrics of learner engagement, faculty interaction, knowledge retention, and satisfaction were collected and analyzed during and after the course.
Results
Of 56 PS residencies, 31 registered (55.4%; 8/8 Canadian and 23/48 US; p = 0.006), including 42 learners overall. The virtual BC budget was $15,500 (USD), 54% of the anticipated in-person course. Pre- and post-tests were administered, revealing significant knowledge improvement (48.6% [286/589] vs 66.9% [89/133] p < 0.0002). Learner surveys (n = 14) suggested the virtual BC facilitated fellowship transition (85%) and strengthened peer-group camaraderie (69%), but in-person events were still favored (77%). Program Directors (PD) were surveyed, and respondents (n = 22) also favored in-person events (61%). PDs not registering their learners (n = 7) perceived insufficient value-added and concern for excessive participants.
Conclusions
The virtual bootcamp format reduced overall expenses, interfered less with schedules, achieved more inclusive reach, and facilitated content archiving. Despite these advantages, learners and program directors still favored in-person education.
Level of evidence
III.