StayCurrentMD · Treatment of First-Time Perianal Abscess in Childhood, Balance Recurrence and Fistula Formation Rate with Medical Intervention
Article1 min read·Published May 2017Older

Treatment of First-Time Perianal Abscess in Childhood, Balance Recurrence and Fistula Formation Rate with Medical Intervention

dx.doi.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on dx.doi.org ↗

Article · May 2017 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective study of 697 pediatric patients comparing conservative treatment versus incision and drainage for first-time perianal abscess. Conservative management showed significantly lower recurrence and fistula formation rates (12.7%) compared to surgical intervention (24.6%), suggesting delayed surgical approach may optimize outcomes in select cases.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Purpose Because of differences in therapy for first-time perianal abscess, a wide range of recurrences and/or development of fistula-in-ano (RF) rates have been reported. The indication for determining when surgical intervention is needed remains obscure and controversial. This retrospective study sought to compare outcomes of conservative treatment with those after incision and drainage (ID) to determine the optimal time for surgical intervention. Methods A total of 697 patients with first-time perianal abscess were included in this study. The median patient age at the time of onset was 129 days (range: 5–5,110 days). The median follow-up period was 395 days (range: 120–760 days). Results Of the 697 patients with first-time perianal abscess, 355 (50.9%) patients who received conservative treatment had 12.7% (45/355) RF rate, which is less than that of abscesses treated with ID (24.6%, 72/297; p 

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →