StayCurrentMD · The Pediatric Surgery Match from the Applicant Perspective
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2022Older

The Pediatric Surgery Match from the Applicant Perspective

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jan 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Survey of 63 successfully matched pediatric surgery applicants reveals that total case volume, neonatal experience, faculty interactions, and in-person interviews are the most valued program characteristics. Applicants ranked vacation time, mission trips, and simulation labs as least important when creating their rank lists.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have examined characteristics critical to make a successful applicant in the pediatric surgery match. No previous study has focused on what applicants consider important as they interview pediatric surgery training programs.

Study Design

Successfully matched applicants to our training program from 2018-2020 were identified and a 49-question survey sent electronically. In addition to a descriptive analysis of responses, comparisons between those who matched into one of their top three programs and those who matched outside of their top three programs were made. A Likert scale was used and data are reported as mean (95% confidence intervals).

Results

One hundred and thirty individuals were surveyed. Sixty-three (48%) responded. The most important characteristics identified were total index case volume 1.94 (1.87, 2.00), interactions with faculty on the interview day 1.84 (1.74, 1.94), neonatal case volume 1.75 (1.61, 1.88) and degree of autonomy 1.63 (1.50, 1.77). Respondents also placed a high importance on the in-person interview experience 1.63 (1.49, 1.77). The least important training program characteristics were quantity of vacation time -0.24 (-0.52, 0.05), opportunity to participate in medical mission trips -0.25 (-0.54, 0.06), paid accommodation at the interview -0.29 (-0.57, 0.00), and access to a simulation laboratory -0.51 (-0.78, -0.24).

Conclusion

Clinical volume, neonatal volume, faulty interactions and the experience on the interview day are the most important characteristics to applicants. There were few, if any, characteristics applicants felt were truly unimportant as they weighed their rank lists. Applicants also placed a high level of importance on an in-person interview

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →