StayCurrentMD · The efficacy of shear-wave elastography – performed simultaneously with Doppler sonography – for differentiating between testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2019Older

The efficacy of shear-wave elastography – performed simultaneously with Doppler sonography – for differentiating between testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jan 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This animal study evaluates combining shear-wave elastography with Doppler ultrasound to improve differentiation between testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis. Using a rat model, researchers measured tissue stiffness and blood flow at different time points to assess whether dual-modality imaging reduces diagnostic errors in acute scrotal emergencies.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background and aim

Shear-wave elastography (SWE) is a noninvasive ultrasonographic procedure that uses sound waves to measure tissue elasticity. Testicular torsion (TT) is an important emergency condition that is frequently misdiagnosed as epididymo-orchitis (EO). Doppler sonography (DS) is currently associated with false-positive and false-negative results owing to a variety of reasons, although its sensitivity and specificity for the differential diagnosis of TT and EO remain high. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of SWE performed simultaneously with DS for differentiating between TT and EO.

Materials and methods

The study included 32 male Wistar albino rats weighing 300–350 g. The rats were randomly divided into the following groups of 8 each: 1. Control group; 2. Sham group; 3. TT group; 4. EO group. The TT group was divided into subgroup 1 (SE and DS performed 1 h after inducing TT) and subgroup 2 (SE and DS performed 24 h after inducing TT). Scrotal SWE and DS were performed simultaneously in all the rats.

Results

There were significant differences in velocity and stiffness between the control group and TT subgroup 1 (P 

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →