StayCurrentMD · The Cross-bar Technique for Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Key Element for Remodeling of the Entire Chest Wall
Article1 min read·Published Oct 2022Older

The Cross-bar Technique for Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Key Element for Remodeling of the Entire Chest Wall

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Oct 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Novel cross-bar technique for pectus excavatum repair demonstrates safety and efficacy in 157 patients with complex chest wall deformities. The diagonal bar placement doubles lifting forces and enables complete chest wall remodeling in older patients with rigid depressions, achieving comparable complication rates to traditional parallel-bar approach without bar displacement.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Introduction: The multiple bar approach was developed to cover broader and heavier teenager/adult chest wall deformities. We designed the cross-bar technique to achieve remodeling of the entire chest wall. This study aimed to demonstrate the role of cross-bar and its benefits over the parallel-bar.

Materials and methods: The cross-bar technique involves placing two bars diagonally and then cross on the target. The primary purposes are to double the lifting forces by making two bars converge on a single target to lift inflexible heavy chest wall depressions or cover lower lateral areas. The results of the cross-bar and parallel-bar are compared for the indications, post-repair outcomes, and complications.

Results: From 2016 to 2019, 247 patients who underwent multiple bar pectus excavatum repair were enrolled in the study: 157 with cross-bar and 90 with parallel-bar. In cross-bar group, 33% (51/157) received three bars in XI fashion to cover the upper depression. Cross-bar group were older (18.0±6.1 vs. 15.7±5.0), had higher Depression index (1.9±0.7 vs. 1.8±0.3), and were less asymmetric (45% vs. 71%) than those in parallel-bar group. The overall complication rates were not different between two groups (9.6% vs. 10%, p=1.0), although cross-bar group was more rigid and complex. There was no bar displacement or reoperation in both groups.

Conclusions: The cross-bar technique is as safe and effective as the parallel-bar technique, even though it was selected to correct more complexities. The cross-bar technique could be a method for complex PE deformities for remodeling of the entire chest wall.

DOI: 10.1055/a-1897-7202

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →