StayCurrentMD · The consistency of an optical body surface scanning method compared with computed tomography: a validation study
Article1 min read·Published Aug 2019Older

The consistency of an optical body surface scanning method compared with computed tomography: a validation study

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Aug 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This validation study demonstrates that optical body surface scanning using a 3D sensor correlates well with CT imaging for measuring pectus excavatum severity in pediatric patients. The depth ratio showed strong correlation (0.84) between methods, supporting optical scanning as a reliable, radiation-free alternative for monitoring chest wall deformity progression and treatment response.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Objective

The ideal noninvasive method for evaluation of pectus excavatum remains to be defined. We sought to verify the accuracy of an optical body surface scanning method compared with conventional CT scan.

Materials and methods

A PrimeSense 3D sensor was used to obtain data from patients undergoing surgical or noninvasive treatment for pectus excavatum. The Haller index, external Haller index, and depth ratio were then calculated from both body scan and computed tomography scan data for the same patients. Statistical analyses were carried out to find if there is consistency between data from body scanning and computed tomography.

Results

Data acquisition was complete. In total, 40 patients (median age: 5.03 years, 11 female) with pectus excavatum undergoing nonoperative (n = 13) or surgical Nuss treatment (n = 27) were included. The Haller index was lower in vacuum bell patients, which also had a higher female proportion. Pearson correlation coefficient between external Haller indices from body scanning and from computed tomography and between the depth ratios from body scanning and from computed tomography were 0.63 and 0.84, respectively. By intraclass correlation coefficient method, the correlation coefficient was 0.56 between external Haller indices from body scanning and from computed tomography and 0.80 between depth ratios from body scanning and from computed tomography.

Conclusion

The optical body surface scanning is a reliable approach to the measurement of PE severity and could be routinely used in the monitoring of PE development of treatment, especially in the pediatric population.

Study type

Diagnostic test.

Level of evidence

Level II.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →