StayCurrentMD · The clinical impact of extrathyroidal extensions on prognoses in pediatric differentiated thyroid cancers
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Sep 2021Older

The clinical impact of extrathyroidal extensions on prognoses in pediatric differentiated thyroid cancers

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Sep 2021 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study of 89 pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma patients demonstrates that both microscopic and gross extrathyroidal extension significantly worsen recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival. The findings suggest current ATA pediatric guidelines should be revised to classify microscopic ETE as intermediate-risk and gross ETE as high-risk.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background

The prognostic impact of extrathyroidal extensions (ETE) on clinical outcomes has not been well studied in pediatric thyroid cancers. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes according to the extent of ETE in pediatric and adolescent thyroid cancers.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 89 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients under 19 years of age who underwent total thyroidectomy with central neck dissections (CND) between 1997 and 2018. We compared the clinicopathological features among three groups: no ETE, microscopic ETE, and gross ETE.

Results

The median follow-up time was 111 months. The mean age was 15.3 years and the mean tumor size was 2.4 cm. Tumor sizes larger than 2 cm (OR = 9.2, p = 0.001), exhibited bilaterality (OR = 4.3, p = 0.006), were an aggressive variant (OR = 5.8, p = 0.006), and exhibited central lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.3, p = 0.018), lateral lymph node metastasis (OR = 9.2, p = 0.001), recurrence (OR = 3.9, p = 0.038), and distant metastasis (OR = 4.4, p = 0.016) were associated with gross ETE. There was no remarkable difference in clinicopathological characteristics between the no ETE group and microscopic ETE group, except for aggressive variants (OR = 5.5, p = 0.008). There was a significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates according to the extent of ETE (p = 0.025). Furthermore, the distant metastasis-free survival curve presented a significant difference among the three groups (p = 0.018). Both microscopic ETE and gross ETE were significantly associated with worse prognoses in pediatric thyroid cancers.

Conclusions

We recommend that microscopic ETE should be included in the intermediate risk category and that gross ETE should be stratified in the high risk group in future revisions of ATA pediatric guidelines.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →