StayCurrentMD · Surgical tray reduction for cost saving in pediatric surgical cases: A qualitative systematic review
Article1 min read·Published May 2020Older

Surgical tray reduction for cost saving in pediatric surgical cases: A qualitative systematic review

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · May 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Systematic review demonstrates that standardizing surgical instrument trays and doctor preference cards in pediatric surgery reduces instruments per set by 40-70%, yielding 20% cost savings without compromising safety or OR time. Implementation challenges in pediatric populations due to wide age ranges can be overcome through evidence-based tray optimization.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background

Standardization of surgical instrument trays and doctor preference cards (DPC) are known to reduce the cost of adult surgical cases. The practice in pediatric surgery may be more complex owing to a wide range of patient age, leading to difficulty with practice implementation and loss of potential financial savings, which underscore the importance of the review of this topic.

Methods

A systematic review of pediatric surgical tray standardization and cost-effectiveness was performed. Original and review articles from 2000 to 2018 were extracted from MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane, and an electronic search through Scopus. After screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles were selected and reviewed.

Results

Five articles were included. On average, discontinuation of disposable instruments and standardization of equipment resulted in a removal of 40%–70% of surgical instruments per set. This yielded a cost savings of 20% (an average US $200), with no intraoperative complications or perceived safety issues.

Conclusions

Standardization of operating room (OR) doctor preference cards (DPC) and surgical instrument trays in pediatric surgical cases result in lower operative supply costs without impacting OR time or safety.

Level of evidence

Level 3.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →