StayCurrentMD · Subcutaneous Analgesic System versus Epidural for Post-Operative Pain Control in Surgical Pediatric Oncology Patients
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Oct 2020Older

Subcutaneous Analgesic System versus Epidural for Post-Operative Pain Control in Surgical Pediatric Oncology Patients

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Oct 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective study comparing subcutaneous analgesic systems to epidural catheters in 101 pediatric oncology patients after open tumor resection surgery. SAS provided equivalent pain control with faster ambulation and return to diet, fewer device complications, and reduced discharge narcotic use compared to epidural.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Pediatric oncology patients often undergo open operations for tumor resection, and epidural catheters are commonly utilized for pain control. Our purpose was to evaluate whether a subcutaneous analgesic system (SAS) provides equivalent post-operative pain control.

Methods

An IRB approved, retrospective chart review of children age <18 undergoing open abdominal, pelvic or thoracic surgery for tumor resection between 2017 and 2019 who received either epidural or SAS for post-operative pain control was performed. Comparisons of morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain scores, and post-operative course were made using parametric and non-parametric analyses.

Results

Of 101 patients, median age was 7 years (2 months–17.9 years). There were 65 epidural and 36 SAS patients. Transverse laparotomy was the most common incision (41%), followed by thoracotomy (29%). Pain scores, MME, urinary catheter days, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) were similar between the two groups. Urinary catheter use was more common in epidural patients (70% vs 30%, p=<0.001). SAS patients had faster time to ambulation and time to regular diet by 1 day (p = 0.02). Epidural patients more commonly had a complication with the pain device (20% vs 3%, p=0.02) and were more likely to be discharged with narcotics (60% vs. 40%, p=0.04). Charges associated with the hospital stay were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

In pediatric oncology patients undergoing open abdominal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery, SAS may provide similar pain control to epidural, but with faster post-operative recovery, fewer complications, and less discharge narcotic use. A prospective study is needed to validate these results.

Type of Study

Retrospective Comparative

Level of Evidence

Level III

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →