Selective use of sternal elevation before substernal dissection in more than 2000 Nuss repairs at a single institution
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Aug 2020 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Retrospective analysis of 2,037 Nuss repairs demonstrates that selective sternal elevation before substernal tunnel creation is safe in primary cases, with no cardiac injuries observed. However, two cardiac injuries occurred in patients with previous sternotomy, and infection rates remained comparable regardless of sternal elevation use.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Background/purpose
Evaluate the safety of sternal elevation (SE) used selectively before creating the substernal tunnel during the Nuss procedure.
Methods
An IRB-approved (01-05-EX-0175-HOSP), single institution, retrospective review was performed (1/1/1997–11/20/2017). Primary and secondary Nuss repairs (i.e., previous Nuss, Ravitch, thoracotomy, or sternotomy) are included. SE use, cardiac injuries, and pectus bar infections are reported. Chi square and Fisher's exact test (FE) were used (critical p < .05).
Results
2037 patients [(80% male; mean age 15.2 years (SD = 4.4, range 3–46); mean Haller index (HI) 5.3 (SD = 5.7, range 1.73–201)] underwent Nuss repair. SE was used before creating the substernal tunnel in 171 (8.4%): 160 (8.2%) of 1949 primary and 11 (12.5%) of 88 secondary repairs. SE use increased significantly [χ2(2) = 118.93; p < .001] over time and with increasing HI [χ2(3) = 59.9; p < .001]. No cardiac injuries occurred in primary repairs but two occurred in patients with previous sternotomy. Infection rates were not different with (2.9%) or without SE (1.8%) [χ2(1) =1.14; p = .285] and not higher with off-label VB (1.5%) versus other SE techniques (3.8%) [FE, p = .65)].
Conclusion
Selective use of sternal elevation before substernal dissection during the Nuss procedure is safe but may not prevent cardiac injuries in patients with previous sternotomy. Infection rates were not increased with SE.
Type of study
Retrospective review.
Level of evidence
IV