StayCurrentMD · Selection of operative approach in children with Currarino syndrome
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2023Older

Selection of operative approach in children with Currarino syndrome

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Jan 2023 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study of 26 children with Currarino syndrome evaluates surgical approach selection based on anorectal malformation type. Standard and limited posterior sagittal approaches were most common for perineal fistulae, while anterior sagittal or limited posterior approaches were preferred for vestibular fistulae, achieving mean Rintala scores of 16.74.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

To summarize the experience of surgical treatment of children diagnosed with Currarino syndrome, with an emphasis on the selection of an optimal operative approach.

Methods

The clinical materials of patients diagnosed with Currarino syndrome were recorded. Special attention was given to the operative management, particularly the different routes for operation. The type of ARM was the critical point. The Rintala score was used for the evaluation of bowel function.

Results

The medical records of 26 patients were reviewed. Seven were male, and 19 were female, with a mean age of 19.38 ± 13.80 months. The standard posterior sagittal approach (SPS) group included three perineal fistulae, one anal stenosis, one retraction of the rectum after anoplasty for vestibular fistula, one ARM with no fistula, one rectourethral fistula, and one cloaca. In the limited posterior sagittal approach (LPS) group, there were 13 perineal fistulae, one displacement of the rectum, and one retraction of the rectum after anoplasty for the vestibular fistula. In addition, the transanal approach (TA) and anterior sagittal approach (AS) were also used. The mean follow-up time was 39.48 ± 26.84 m. The Rintala score was 16.74 ± 2.93.

Conclusion

For a perineal fistula, SPS or LPS should be used to reach anoplasty and remove the presacral mass. For a vestibular fistula, the AS or LPS should be chosen. For anal stenosis, SPS or LPS should be used.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →