StayCurrentMD · Routine Ultrasound Control after Successful Intussusception Reduction in Children: Is It Really Necessary?
Article1 min read·Published Oct 2020Older

Routine Ultrasound Control after Successful Intussusception Reduction in Children: Is It Really Necessary?

dx.doi.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on dx.doi.org ↗

Article · Oct 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study of 373 ileocolic intussusception episodes demonstrates that routine ultrasound before restarting oral feeding in asymptomatic children after successful enema reduction does not reduce recurrence rates (10.3% vs 10.8%). The findings challenge traditional practice protocols and suggest ultrasound may be safely omitted in stable patients, potentially reducing hospital stay and healthcare costs.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Introduction Recurrence of ileocolic intussusception (ICI) has been related to residual bowel wall edema after enema reduction. Early oral tolerance has been associated with a higher risk of re-intussusception, so an imaging test (ultrasound) has traditionally been performed before restarting oral tolerance. Our aim is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of performing a routine ultrasound in patients who remain asymptomatic after successful enema reduction.

Materials and Methods A retrospective observational study was performed in patients with ICI who underwent a successful enema reduction between 2005 and 2019 and distributed in two groups according to whether or not a routine ultrasound was performed before restarting oral tolerance: group A (ultrasound) or B (no ultrasound). We analyzed demographic, clinical and laboratory variables, length of hospital stay, and recurrence rate.

Results We included 366 patients who presented 373 ICI episodes (165 in group A and 208 in group B), without significant differences in gender and age. Group A patients presented a higher percentage of vomiting and bloody stools than those in group B without differences in the other clinical features studied, time of evolution, or laboratory variables. Group A presented a higher length of hospital stay than group B (36 vs. 24 hours), although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.30). No statistically significant differences were observed in the recurrence rate between both groups (10.3% A vs. 10.8% B; p = 0.83).

Conclusion Performing routine ultrasound before restarting oral tolerance in asymptomatic patients after successful ICI reduction does not decrease the risk of re-intussusception and should not be routinely encouraged.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →