Role of urodynamics in male patients of high-anorectal malformations: a prospective study
link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on link.springer.com ↗Article · Jan 2021 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Prospective urodynamic study of 41 male patients post-surgical repair for high anorectal malformations reveals 30% have unsafe bladders despite being asymptomatic. Findings demonstrate occult neurovesical dysfunction requiring early intervention to prevent long-term renal complications in this population.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Purpose
Association of spinal or vertebral anomalies and the iatrogenic denervation during surgical correction of anorectal malformation patients especially in boys can lead to neurogenic bladder inthese subset of patients. The paucity of literature with regard to urodynamic studies focusing exclusively in male children with high-anorectal malformations (HARM) lead us to analyze the urodynamic changes. The objective was to study urodynamic profile in male patients who have undergone surgery for anorectal malformation.
Methods
Male high-anorectal malformation patients who had completed all the stages of repair were prospective studied. Following the basic work up, all patients based on the urodynamics were categorized into 2 groups as safe or unsafe bladders. Unsafe bladder was defined as detrusor pressure > 40 cm (high detrusor pressure) or pressure variability of 15 cm of water (detrusor overactivity) or significant post-void residue. MRI was limited to patients with only abnormal urodynamics to rule out spinal causes of neurogenic bladder and due to financial constraints, it could not be offered to all patients.
Results
41 HARM meet the exclusion criteria. All patients were asymptomatic with none having history of urinary tract infections. Ultrasound showed bladder wall thickening in 31.7% patients. UDS revealed reduction in bladder capacity and compliance was noted in 31.7% and 30% patients, respectively. Elevated detrusor pressures (> 40 cm of water) were noted in 10% (4/41), detrusor overactivity with concomitant elevated detrusor pressures in 19.5% (8/41) and normal UDS in 70% (29/41). 13 patients (31.7%) had abnormal cystometric parameters with 12(30%) having unsafe bladders. MRI confirmed sacral agenesis in 1 patient with unsafe bladder.
Conclusion
Urodynamics can demonstrate occult neurovesical dysfunction in patients with HARM. This would help in early renal protective therapy and prevent the burden of long-term sequelae of neurovesical dysfunction in HARM patients.