StayCurrentMD · Risk factors and outcomes in pediatric blunt cardiac injuries
Article1 min read·Published May 2023Older

Risk factors and outcomes in pediatric blunt cardiac injuries

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · May 2023 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This TQIP database study of 266,045 pediatric blunt trauma patients identifies pulmonary contusions and hemothorax as the strongest independent risk factors for blunt cardiac injury, with 26% mortality in affected children. The findings support targeted cardiac screening protocols when these thoracic injuries are present following pediatric trauma.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

Unlike adults, less is known of the etiology and risk factors for blunt cardiac injury (BCI) in children. Identifying risk factors for BCI in pediatric patients will allow for more specific screening practices following blunt trauma.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2017 to 2019. All patients ≤ 16 years injured following blunt trauma were included. Demographics, mechanism, associated injuries, injury severity, and outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression was used to determine specific risk factors for BCI.

Results

Of 266,045 pediatric patients included in the analysis, the incidence of BCI was less than 0.2%. The all-cause mortality seen in patients with BCI was 26%. Motor-vehicle collisions (MVCs) were the most common mechanism, although no association with seatbelt use was seen in adolescents (p = 0.158). The strongest independent risk factors for BCI were pulmonary contusions (OR 15.4, p < 0.001) and hemothorax (OR 8.9, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Following trauma, the presence of pulmonary contusions or hemothorax should trigger additional screening investigations specific for BCI in pediatric patients.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →