StayCurrentMD · Reply to Letter to the Editor
Article1 min read·Published May 2020Older

Reply to Letter to the Editor

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · May 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Response to correspondence regarding laparoscopic hernia repair outcomes, clarifying that reported complications (infections, reoperations, granuloma) occurred in both surgical groups with no laparoscopy-specific adverse events. Technical modifications using 2mm Maryland dissector were occasionally needed for challenging anatomy.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

We wish to thank Dr. Jahoorahmad Patankar for his interest in our manuscript. Complications that included infections, reoperations, and granuloma were detailed in the report. Both groups were at risk for these complications. There were no complications attributable to the use of laparoscopy, including vascular/bowel injury, port site incisional hernia, or incarcerated omentum. There were no patients who required conversion to an open operation due to inability to complete the repair. A few patients required the use of a 2 mm Maryland dissector placed via a stab incision to assist in the repair due to the redundancy of the sac around the internal ring or inability to clearly visualize the internal ring due to dilated bowel and small abdominal domain.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →