StayCurrentMD · Reply to letter to the Editor
Article1 min read·Published May 2019Older

Reply to letter to the Editor

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · May 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This correspondence responds to methodological critique regarding experimental animal age selection in oesophageal research. The authors clarify their study scope extends beyond early postnatal oesophageal growth to encompass broader oesophageal disease applications, justifying their model selection.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

We thank Professor Hutson for his interest in our contribution to the BAPS issue of the journal [1] and agree with him that our choice of experimental animals' age would have been poor if we aimed to solely study early postnatal oesophageal growth. It may however have escaped Professor Hutson's notice that our study extends beyond oesophageal atresia repair into other oesophageal diseases, as exemplified in the introduction and discussion.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →