StayCurrentMD · Preexisting neural factors that contribute to dysmotility in esophageal atresia: a systematic review
Article1 min read·Published Dec 2022Older

Preexisting neural factors that contribute to dysmotility in esophageal atresia: a systematic review

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Dec 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This systematic review examines preexisting neural abnormalities contributing to esophageal dysmotility in esophageal atresia patients before surgical repair. Analysis of 14 studies (human and animal models) identified proteins, enzymes, growth factors, and genes affecting esophageal innervation and neuromuscular function, advancing understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Esophageal dysmotility in esophageal atresia (EA) relates to abnormal development of esophageal innervation and musculature and to the esophageal repair. Few studies have investigated the preexisting dysmotility in EA, present prior to surgery. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on neuronal studies in EA, to understand the causative factors for esophageal dysmotility. We performed a systematic review (PubMed, EMBASE, EBM, CINAHL databases; January 1947–February 2021) in accordance with PRISMA (PROSPERO number CRD42020171014). Fourteen studies were identified (eleven human, 187 EA patients; three animal, 64 EA rat specimens). Neural factors affecting esophageal dysmotility in human and animal studies included proteins, enzymes, growth factors, and genes, which play a role in the nervous system or neuroendocrine system, some of which have functions as neuromodulators or neurotransmitters. This systematic review has identified neural factors that affect esophageal dysmotility and contributes toward our understanding of the underlying dysmotility in patients with EA. The studies identified are important and essential for successful translation of basic science knowledge to impact clinical practice and understanding. Level of evidence: III.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →