Porcine dermal patches as a risk factor for recurrence after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair
link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on link.springer.com ↗Article · Nov 2020 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Retrospective study of 50 CDH patients identifies porcine dermis patches as a significant risk factor for hernia recurrence (75% vs 4% with Gore-Tex, 0% with primary closure). Authors recommend against using porcine patches for diaphragmatic repair based on 3.5-year follow-up data.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Purpose
Recurrence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a treatment-related morbidity which can be preventable. There is no consensus about the ideal material for diaphragmatic substitution. The aim of our study is to identify if the use of porcine dermis patches increases the risk of CDH recurrence.
Methods
Retrospective review of medical records of CDH patients treated between 2013 and 2017 in our center was carried out. Demographic, clinical and surgical variables were collected. Regression analysis was performed to identify which factors increase the risk of recurrence.
Results
50 patients entered the study. 94% of the patients had a left CDH, mean observed/expected lung-to-head ratio was 46%. 17 patients underwent a primary closure, the rest a patch closure: 25 Gore-Tex® and 8 porcine dermis patches were used. Seven patients presented recurrence (14%). Median follow-up time was 3.5 years (1.2–6.2). Univariate analysis revealed that the use of a porcine dermis patch (75%) increased the risk of recurrence compared with Gore-Tex® patch (4%) and primary closure (0%) p < 0.001 (HR 58.7; IC 95%: 6.9–501.2; p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The main risk factor for CDH recurrence is the use of a porcine dermis patch. We do not recommend the use of these patches for CDH repair.