StayCurrentMD · Pediatric cervical spine injury in the United States: Defining the burden of injury, need for operative intervention, and disparities in imaging across trauma centers
Article1 min read·Published Jun 2020Older

Pediatric cervical spine injury in the United States: Defining the burden of injury, need for operative intervention, and disparities in imaging across trauma centers

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jun 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This NTDB analysis of 84,554 pediatric trauma patients found cervical spine injuries requiring intervention are rare (0.2%), yet screening imaging rates remain high at 12.8%. Stand-alone pediatric trauma centers demonstrated superior practice patterns by reducing unnecessary CT utilization while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background

Pediatric cervical spine injury (PCSI) in children is rare. Incidence of PCSI requiring intervention is not known, and imaging practices for screening in United States trauma centers are not well described.

Methods

The 2016 NTDB was queried for patients younger than 15 years with PCSI. Incidence of PCSI, operative interventions, and imaging rates were analyzed by age and ACS accreditation status.

Results

Of 84,554 children, 873 (1.03%) had PCSI. Patients <4 years were less likely to have PCSI (0.68% vs. 1.1%, RR 0.59, p < 0.001). 165 children (0.20%) required an intervention for PCSI. 12.8% of all children were screened for PCSI with imaging, 9.3% with CT, and 3.2% with plain X-rays.

In spite of similar injury and intervention rates, stand-alone pediatric trauma centers were less likely than others to image patients without PCSI (11% vs. 13% p < 0.001), less likely to utilize CT scan (5.8% vs. 10.6% p < 0.001) and more likely to utilize plain films (5.2% vs. 2.4% p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite exceedingly low rates of PSCI requiring intervention (0.2%), imaging rates for screening are significant. Stand-alone pediatric trauma centers outperform others in limiting unnecessary imaging.

Level of evidence

IV.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →