Optimal management of gastrojejunal tube in the ENFit era — Interventions that changed practice
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Sep 2020 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This study evaluated complications of jejunal feeding tubes in children following introduction of ENFit connectors in 2017. Two interventions—fixative sutures and conversion to balloon devices—reduced complication rates from 76% to 30%, with balloon gastrojejunostomy showing superior outcomes compared to PEGJ.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Background
We experienced a high incidence of jejunal tube (JEJ) displacement in children who underwent percutaneous endoscopic transgastric jejunostomy (PEGJ), ever since the introduction of ENFit connector (2017).
Methods
Two interventions were introduced in 2018 — fixative suture to PEGJ ENFit connector, and conversion to balloon transgastric–jejunal feeding device (Balloon GJ) whenever possible. Children receiving PEGJ and Balloon GJ in 2.8 years were categorized into 3 eras: 2016 (pre-ENFit), 2017 (ENFit) and 2018 (interventional), for comparison of complications and sequelae. Kaplan–Meier survival curves with log-rank test (P < 0.05) were applied.
Results
100 children underwent 323 JEJ insertions — PEGJ (n = 237), Balloon GJ (n = 86). Complications occurred in 188 JEJs (58%), more frequently with PEGJ than Balloon GJ (69% vs. 29%, P < 0.0005). PEGJ had higher complication/1000-tube-days (6 vs. 0, P < 0.0005). In 2018, complication rate reduced from 76% to 30% (P < 0.0005) owing to effectiveness of PEGJ connector suture application (P = 0.019), and increased utilization of Balloon GJ (16% to 44%, P = 0.005). Balloon GJ showed better JEJ survival (P = 0.019), less morbidity (emergency attendance, X-ray) and greater cost-effectiveness than PEGJ.
Conclusions
Balloon GJ had better overall outcomes than PEGJ. Suture application to connector successfully reduced JEJ internal displacement in PEGJ; however, conversion to Balloon GJ should be strongly considered.
Level of evidence
II