Open tunneled central line insertion in children — External or internal jugular vein?
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Jul 2018 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Retrospective study of 942 tunneled central venous catheters in 761 pediatric patients comparing external jugular vein versus internal jugular vein access using open technique. EJV insertion achieved 91% success rate with comparable complication rates to IJV, offering reduced surgical morbidity and improved hemostasis in coagulopathic patients.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Background/Purpose
Tunneled central venous catheters (TCVCs) are commonly used to manage pediatric patients with chronic disease. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of external jugular vein (EJV) and internal jugular vein (IJV) tunneled catheters inserted using the open technique.
Methods
This is a single institution retrospective analysis of patients requiring an IJV or EJV TCVC in the period between 2009 and 2014. Data collected included the following: patient demographics, site/side of insertion, catheter size, number of lumens, duration of catheter in situ, and complications.
Results
A total of 942 TCVCs (690 IJV; 252 EJV) were inserted in 761 patients. No statistical difference was seen between the two groups for procedure indications, age, gender, duration of line in situ, side of insertion, catheter size, number of lumens, and rate of premature catheter removals owing to complications. Rates of infection, blockage, and breakage were similar, but dislodgement was higher in the IJV group. EJV access was successful in 91% of attempts.
Conclusions
Open EJV TCVC insertion is a safe, quick, and feasible alternative to IJV insertion. EJV access offers comparable outcomes, reduced surgical morbidity, and improved hemostasis especially in children with coagulopathy and/or reduced platelet counts.
Type of study
Retrospective comparative study.
Level of evidence
Level 3.