StayCurrentMD · One-Stage versus Two-Stage ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the Management of Pediatric Choledocholithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Article1 min read·Published Nov 2025

One-Stage versus Two-Stage ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the Management of Pediatric Choledocholithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Nov 2025 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This systematic review compares single-stage (combined laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ERCP) versus two-stage (preoperative ERCP followed by interval cholecystectomy) approaches for treating bile duct stones in pediatric patients. The analysis addresses a gap in pediatric-specific evidence regarding optimal surgical timing and technique for choledocholithiasis management.

  • Single-stage LC with intraoperative ERCP and two-stage preoperative ERCP followed by LC are both used for pediatric choledocholithiasis.
  • Adult meta-analyses show comparable safety between approaches, but pediatric-specific evidence remains limited.
  • Optimal management strategy for pediatric choledocholithiasis is still debated due to lack of consensus data.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

The optimal approach to managing pediatric choledocholithiasis remains a subject of ongoing debate. Both single-stage strategies, combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with bile duct clearance via intraoperative ERCP and sphincterotomy, and two-stage approaches, typically involving preoperative ERCP followed by interval LC, are widely employed. While prior meta-analyses in predominantly adult populations suggest comparable safety profiles between these strategies, pediatric-specific data remain lacking in consensus.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →