StayCurrentMD · Most children experience resolution of idiopathic pediatric rectal prolapse with bowel management alone
Article1 min read·Published Feb 2022Older

Most children experience resolution of idiopathic pediatric rectal prolapse with bowel management alone

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Feb 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective study of 47 children with idiopathic rectal prolapse demonstrates that 93.6% achieved resolution through conservative bowel management alone, with median resolution time of 9 months. Only 3 patients required surgical intervention, supporting non-operative management as first-line treatment for pediatric rectal prolapse.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Background: Recent studies in children with idiopathic rectal prolapse report up to 48% require surgical intervention to manage refractory disease. We sought to examine outcomes of our non-surgical approach to managing rectal prolapse using a bowel management program.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all children with the diagnosis of rectal prolapse between 2011 and 2020. Children with a rectal polyp or hemorrhoid were excluded.

Results: 47 children with rectal prolapse were identified (median age at diagnosis of 4 years (IQR 3,7.75); age ≤ 4 years n = 30; age > 4 years n = 17). Associated diagnoses included constipation (n = 45, 96%) and psychiatric diagnoses (n = 7, 14%). Children underwent a bowel management program including stimulant laxatives in 44 (94%) and osmotic laxatives in 2 (4%). Median follow-up time was 181 days (IQR 77, 238). Median time to resolution of rectal prolapse was 9 months (IQR 4, 13) with a maximum time to resolution of 31 months. We compared children ≤ 4 years old (Group A) to those > 4 years old (Group B). Psychiatric diagnoses were less common in Group A (3.5 vs. 38.9%, p = 0.003). Median time to spontaneous resolution was 6.5 months (IQR 3.5, 9.5) in Group A versus 13.5 (IQR 4, 16) months in Group B, p = 0.13. No differences in surgical intervention were identified. Three (6.4%) patients required surgery for prolapse.

Conclusions: A bowel management program is an effective treatment for most children with rectal prolapse. This data suggests that surgical intervention is unnecessary in most children.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.003

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →